Investigating the Tendency towards Research in the Curriculum of a Paramedical Faculty

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Management, Farhangian University, Rasoul Akram Campus, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Education, Farhangian University, Shahid Paknejad Campus, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Background: Today, conducting research is among the most important skills in medical sciences, and plays a significant role in terms of improving students’ learning and their career prospects. This study aimed to evaluate the research factors in the curriculum of paramedical faculty at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd, Iran. Methods: The statistical population included the students at the paramedical faculty of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in 2019. Simple random sampling was applied and 224 students were selected. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire. Its validity was determined based on the opinions of professors and experts, and its reliability was measured at 0.87 using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: From the paramedical students’ viewpoints, a number of research factors in the curriculum like individual factors (1.70), motivational factors (2.05), service delivery factors (2.11), and cultural administrative factors (1.78) are not in a favorable situation (p <0.05). Besides, in terms of prioritization, the service delivery factors of research in the curriculum have the greatest importance, and the individual factors have the least importance. Conclusion: The authorities, curriculum planners, and medical practitioners must take the necessary measures to enhance the presence of research factors in the curriculum of paramedical students.

Keywords


Frey BB, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. Sage Publications; 2018 Jan 29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139
Pinch, K. J. (2009). The importance of evaluation research. Journal of Experiential Education31(3), 390-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100306
Snow NE, Narváez D, editors. Self, Motivation, and Virtue: Innovative Interdisciplinary Research. Routledge; 2019 Aug 29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1556939
Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Reyes-Gonzalez L, Veloso F, Perez-Angón MA. The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0151328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151328
Severinsson E. Research supervision: supervisory style, research‐related tasks, importance and quality–part 1. Journal of Paramedicine management. 2012; 20(2): 215-223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01361.x
Carrillo FJ. Knowledge-based development as a new economic culture. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2015 Dec;1(2):15. DOI: 10.1186/s40852-015-0017-5
Pilat D, Fukasaku Y. OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Data Science Journal. 2007;6: 4-11. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.6.OD4
Jacobs CD, Cross PC. The value of medical student research: the experience at Stanford University School of Medicine. Medical education. 1995 Sep;29(5):342-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb00023.x
Narayana PS, Varalakshmi D, Pullaiah T. Research methodology in plant science. Scientific Publishers; 2016 Nov 1.
Alaei M, Azami A. Study of student attitudes toward research in Ilam university of medical sciences. Journal of Ilam university of medical sciences. 2004;12(42-43):39-42. [Persian] DOI: 10.29252/rme.10.1.56
Delavar A. Theoretical and Practical Principles of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. Tehran. Roshd Publications. Eighteenth Edition. 2018
Nikrouz L, Rouzitalab Mahin, Raygan Yazdi Alireza, Naqizadeh Mohammad Mehdi, Taghavi F. Investigating the Barriers to Presenting Student Research Projects from the Students' Viewpoint. Journal of Fasa University of Medical Sciences. 2012; 2 (2):113-119.
Rouhollahi A. Investigating Factors Affecting the Development of Student Research. Journal of Teaching and Learning Research. 2015; 22(7):175-188. DOI: 10.22070/2.7.175
Safari Moradabadi Ali, Ramazan Khani Ali, Aghamolaie Teimour, Hosseini Marzieh, Dadipour S. Barriers to research from the perspective of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2017; 7, (3): pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.29252/rme.9.3.9
Chakraborti C, Bourgeois III DJ, Gleeson E, Gunderson W. Identifying barriers to successful research during medical school. Medical Education Development. 2012 Mar 2;2(1):5-8. DOI: 10.4081/ed.2012.e2
Hama EA. Obstacles of scientific research from the point of view of the members of the Faculty of Basic Education University of Salahaddin/Erbil. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences. 2019 Jun 20;23(3):36-52. Doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.23.3.3
Khalaf AJ, Aljowder AI, Buhamaid MJ, Alansari MF, Jassim GA. Attitudes and barriers towards conducting research amongst primary care physicians in Bahrain: a cross-sectional study. BMC family practice. 2019 Dec;20(1):20. doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0911-1
Ichsan, I., Wahyuniati, N., McKee, R. et al. Attitudes, barriers, and enablers towards conducting primary care research in Banda Aceh, Indonesia: a qualitative research study. Asia Pac Fam Med 17, 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0045-y
Kuuppelomäki M., & Tuomi J. Finnish nurses' views on their research activities. Journal of Clinical Paramedicine. 2003; 12(4): 589-600. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00756.x
Parahoo K. Barriers to and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland. Journal of advanced Paramedicine. 2000; 31(1): 89-98. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01256.x
Tuppal CP, Vega PD, Ninobla MM, Reñosa MD, Al-Battashi A, Arquiza G, Baua EP. Revisiting the Barriers to and Facilitators of Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing. 2019;9(1):90-102. DOI: 10.14710/nmjn.v9i1.20827
Adamsen L, Larsen K, Bjerregaard L, Madsen JK. Danish research‐active clinical nurses overcome barriers in research utilization. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2003 Mar;17(1):57-65.-65. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00124.x