Students’ Experiences of E-Learning Challenges; a Phenomenological Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Administration & Planning, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Tel: +98 939 7991215 Email: maryam.shafiei@gmail.com

2 Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: The emergence and use of e-learning in education have been one of the most important achievements of higher education which can solve many of the problems of this system, and addressing the challenges of e-learning are one of the concerns and problems of our society. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the students’ experience of e-learning challenges at the Virtual School of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Method: The research design was qualitative with the phenomenological method. Potential participants included students from Virtual School of SUMS. 10 students were selected using a purposive sampling method with a standard technique. The data collection method consisted of a semi-structured interview. After coding the data using thematic analysis method, basic, organizing, and inclusive themes were extracted. Results: Results classified the challenges of e-learning at the Virtual School of SUMS into six general categories which are as follows: 13 educational challenges, including the extensive amount of context in the courses as well as a large number of modules, disregarding the educational prerequisites of the field, failure of professors to accompany students at the early stages of the projects, etc.; 10 organizational challenges including non-diversification of e-learning courses, high availability of online academic staff due to lack of e-learning experience, 9 ethical challenges such as lack of appropriate culture for applying this discipline, negative perception towards e-learning,  8 technical challenges including low speed of internet, shortage of physical spaces in e-learning, 5 supportive challenges such as lack of facilities, lack of permission to use the university canteen, 5 evaluation challenges such as mandatory in-person exams in e-learning courses,  not allocating a reasonable proportion of the final mark to in-person exams, 3 managerial challenges such as inefficiency of the educational content, rejection of students by the head of virtual faculty due to lack of time and lastly, 2 communicational challenges such as lack of interaction with academic staff and classmates as well as lack of face-to-face communication. Conclusion: Understanding the challenges and obstacles of establishing e-learning in Iran's higher education and providing practical solutions for them, developing this type of education and, as a result, the excellence of Iran's educational system.

Keywords

References

Jahini S. Reviewing the Views of Faculty Members on the Issues of the Development of Virtual Education at Payam Noor University of West Azerbaijan Province. Master’s Degree in Educational Management. University of Tehran, Faculty of Humanities. 2012.
Parker, CD. A Descriptive Study to Identify Deterrents to Participation in EmployerProvided E-Learning. Dissertation of Ph.D. Capella University. 2004.
Sejzi AA, Aris B, Yahya N. The phenomenon of virtual university in new age: trends and changes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;8;56:565- 72. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.689
Khan B H. The people-process-product continuum in e-learning: The e-learning P3 model. Educational TechnologySaddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ. 2004; 44(5): 33-40.
Tang TS, Halani K, Sohal P, Bains P, Khan N. Do cultural and psychosocial factors contribute to diabetes risk? A look into Vancouver’s South Asian community. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.04.015
Islam N, Beer M, Slack F. (2015). Managing online presence in the E-learning environment: technological support for academic staff. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3): 91-100. Doi: 10.11114/jets.v3i3.744
Talebian S, Mohammadi HM, Rezvanfar A.. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education: Advantages, Disadvantages, Conveniences and Limitations of Applying E-learning to Agricultural Students in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 152: 300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199
Schroeder A, Minocha S, Schneider C. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2010;26(3):159-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x
Afzalkhani M, Ghods S. Evaluation of the Situation of Intelligent Secondary Schools Deployment in Semnan Province from the Viewpoint of Managers and Teachers. Information Technology and Communication Technology Quarterly in Educational Sciences. 2003;2(1):23-39.
Beckwith FJ. Public education, religious establishment, and the challenge of intelligent design. Notre Dame JL Ethics & Pub. Pol’y. 2003;17:461. doi: 10.5840/ pc20035142
Sailor W. Making RTI work: How smart schools are reforming education through schoolwide response-tointervention. John Wiley & Sons; 2009. doi: 10.1002/9781118269480
Volery T, Lord D. Critical success factors in online education. International journal of educational management. 2000 Sep 1;14(5):216-23. doi: 10.1108/09513540010344731
Khan B H. A framework for web-based learning. Web-based training. 2001: 75-98.
Govindasamy T. Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The internet and higher education. 2001;4(3-4):287-99. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7516(01)00071-9
Frydenberg J. Quality standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2002;3(2). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.109
Selim HM. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. computers & Education. 2007;49(2):396-413. doi: 10.1016/j. compedu.2005.09.004
Fresen JW. Quality assurance practice in online (web-supported) learning in higher education: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
Safavi AA. E-Education from Idea to Practice. Tehran: Researchers of Academic Publish. 2001.
Arkami A. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Development of Virtual Education in Kurdistan University: Moving toward Planning for Conceptual Framework. Master’s Thesis for Educational Planning, Kurdistan University. 2003.
Darab B, Montazer GA. An eclectic model for assessing e-learning readiness in the Iranian universities. Computers & Education. 2011 Apr 1;56(3):900-10. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.002
Forsyth H, Pizzica J, Laxton R, Mahony MJ. Distance education in an era of eLearning: challenges and opportunities for a campus‐focused institution. Higher Education Research & Development. 2010;29(1):15-28. doi: 10.1080/07294360903421350
The Institute for Higher Education Policy. “Quality ON the Line , Benchmarks for Success in Internetbased Distance Education. Washington. DC : IHEP. 2000.
Oxford Brookes University. Institutional Self-Assessment Document. 2016.
Thames Valley University (TVU). A Review of Where We Are and a Proposed Development Plan for the Next Three Years. 2007. [Online]. < http ://mingus. tvu.ac.uk/benchmark/>. Accessed Feb 7, 2017.
Illinois Online Network (ION) University of Illinois. A Tools to Assist in the Design Redesign, and /or Evaluation of Online Courses. [Online] www.ion.uillinois. edu/>. Accessed Feb 7, 2017.
Ruiz JG, Candler C, Teasdale TA. Peer reviewing e-learning: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Academic Medicine. 2007;82(5):503-7. doi: 10.1097/ acm.0b013e31803ead94
Asghari M, Alizadeh M, Kazemi A, Safari H, Asghari F, BAGHERI AM, Heidarzadeh S. An investigation of the challenges of e-learning in medical sciences from the faculty members viewpoints of Tabriz university of medical sciences. doi: 10.29252/jarums.18.4.479
Rabiee A, Nazarian Z, Gharibshaeyan R. An explanation for internet use obstacles concerning e-learning in Iran. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2013;14(3):361- 76. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1412
Yaghoubi J, Malek Mohammadi I, Iravani H, Attaran M, Gheidi A. Virtual Students’ Perceptions of e-Learning in Iran. Online Submission. 2008;7(3). doi: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2009.01.336
Mirzakhani M, Ashrafzadeh H, Ashrafzadeh A. The virtual university: Advantages and disadvantages. In2010 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education 2010:32-36. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/icdle.2010.5606048
Rana H, Lal M. E-learning: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2014;97(5). doi: 10.5120/17004-7154
Alberto A. Understanding Quality Culture in Assuring Learning at Higher Education Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2015. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2743128
Gregory S. Teaching Higher Education Students with Diverse Learning Outcomes in the Virtual World of Second Life®. Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education [Internet]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011;327–56. doi: 10.1108/s2044-9968(2011)0000004017
Mayer R, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press; 2005. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511816819
BASTANI P, AMINI M, NEJAD KT, ZADEH NS. Faculty members’ viewpoints about the present and the ideal teacher evaluation system in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2013;1(4):140-7. doi: 10.18869/acadpub. rme.7.2.1
Gregory S. Teaching Higher Education Students with Diverse Learning Outcomes in the Virtual World of Second Life®. Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education [Internet]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011;327–56. doi: 10.1108/s2044-9968(2011)0000004017
Rice MF, Carter, Jr. RA. Online Teacher Work to Support Self-Regulation of Learning in Students with Disabilities at a Fully Online State Virtual School. Online Learning [Internet]. The Online Learning Consortium; 2016;20(4). doi: 10.24059/olj.v20i4.1054
Long KC. E-Learning, Information Technology, and Student Success in Higher Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2017. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.78
Ashghali Farahani M, Arab Ameri Z, Hajibabaee F, Hosseini AF, Salehi T, et al. Educational management and emotional intelligence in undergraduate nursing students. Quarterly Journal of Nersing Management [Internet]. Armenian Green Publishing Co.; 2016;5(2):26–35. doi: 10.29252/ijnv.5.2.26
Makkizadeh F, Afshani A. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use E-Learning from the Viewpoint of Higher Education Students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences [Internet]. Kowsar Medical Institute; 2019;In Press(In Press). doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.85806
Assareh A, Bidokht MH. Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science. 2011;3:791-5. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Dastjerdi NB. Factors Affecting ICT Adoption among Distance Education Students based on the Technology Acceptance Model—A Case Study at a Distance Education University in Iran. International Education Studies [Internet]. Canadian Center of Science and Education; 2016;9(2):73. doi: 10.5539/ ies.v9n2p73
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 10, Issue 3
September 2019
Pages 1-10

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics