Quality Assessment of Persian Educational Websites for Pregnant Mothers: A Descriptive Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School (Comprehensive Center of Excellence for e-Learning in Medical Sciences) Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of e-Learning Department, Virtual School and Center of Excellence in Electronic learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School (Comprehensive Center of Excellence for e-Learning in Medical Sciences) Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: Raising awareness among pregnant mothers and their participation in self-care can reduce the complications and risks of pregnancy. One of the ways to acquire information for pregnant women is through the Internet and websites. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of Persian educational websites for pregnant mothers. Methods: This was a descriptive survey study. The study population consisted of Persian educational websites for pregnant mothers. Sampling method was Available websites. The first 5 pages of two common search Engines, Google & yahoo, were searched using the keywords “pregnancy” & “education website”. A total of 20 out of 86 websites matched the criteria and were included in the study. The data collection tool was the standard Checklist WebMedQual assessment tool created by Provost in 2006. The validity and reliability of this tool was verified in its original version and then in the localized version based on the frameworks of the template websites in previous studies. The websites were directly observed and evaluated by 9 trained experts in January 2017. The agreement coefficient between the two checklists was completed in groups based on Kappa 0.78 coefficient. The websites were evaluated based on information content indexes, resource validity, design, availability, usability, links, user support and information confidentiality, with the scores ranging from 0 to 85, and the ideal score was considered 60. SPSS 16 was used for data analysis and using one-sample t-test the results were presented as mean score and optimal score. Results: The findings showed a significant difference between the average availability and utilization index of the websites under study (p <0.001), and the mean score (6.2±0.61) was higher than the average score (4.5). Persian websites were less favored in the criteria of content, validity, design, links and support, and their ratings were lower than the average rating of the study. Also, none of the reviewed websites received the total score. Conclusion: Persian websites for pregnancy education are not high in quality. Therefore, pregnant mothers need to seek guidance from specialist doctors and midwives. Website administrators are also advised to consider website evaluation criteria and improve their websites.

Keywords

References

Ybarra M, Suman M. Reasons, assessments, and actions taken: sex and age differences in Internet health information use. Health education research. 2006; 23 (3): 512-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl062 PMid:16880222
Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Villanueva G. An evaluation of Spanish and English on-line information sources regarding pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwifery. 2018; 58: 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.002 PMid:29277038
Gao L-l, Larsson M, Luo S-y. Internet use by Chinese women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2013; 29 (7): 730-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.003 PMid:22958935
Lagan BM, Sinclair M, w GK. Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: A web-based survey. . Birth. 2010; 37 (2): 106 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x PMid:20557533 PMCid:PMC4010857
Song FW WJ, Lundy L, Smith-Dahmen N.. Women, Pregnancy, and Health Information Online: The Making of Informed Patients and Ideal Mothers. Gender Society. 2012; 26 (5): 773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212446336
M. L. A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information.Midwifery.2009;25(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.010
Song H CE, McRoy S, May A. Information needs, seeking behaviors, and support among low-income expectant women. Women Health. 2013;53(8):824. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2013.831019
Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: a systematic review. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016;16(1):65 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0856-5
Bert F, Gualano MR, Brusaferro S, De Vito E, De Waure C, La Torre G, et al. Pregnancy e-health: a multicenter Italian cross-sectional study of Internet use and decision-making among pregnant women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013: jech-2013-202584. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202584 PMid:24072743
Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Advances in preventive medicine. 2017; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9780317 PMid:28656111 PMCid:PMC5471568
Mead N VR, Rogers A, Roland M. What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a primary health resource in England? . J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013; 8 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1258/13558190360468209 https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960300800108 PMid:1268343
Sharzadi L, Evaluation of Persian anxiety disorders websites by WebMedQual scale. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.183-188 PMid:25132712 PMCid:PMC413069
Hu X. Evaluation of content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. bmc oral health. 2017; 17: 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0467-1 PMid:29284468 PMCid:PMC5747117
Jeddi FR. Evaluation models and criteria for hospital quality websites: a systematic review study. electronic physician. 2017; 9 (2): 3786. https://doi.org/10.19082/3786 PMid:28465807 PMCid:PMC5410906
Provost M, Koompalum D, Dong D, Martin BC. The initial development of the WebMedQual scale: domain assessment of the quality construct of health web sites. International journal of medical informatics. 2006; 75 (1): 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.034 PMid:16169770
Xiaosheng Hu. Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. bmc oral health. 2017;17:170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0467-1
Narwani V, Nalamada K, Lee M, Kothari P, Lakhani R. Readability and quality assessment of internet‐based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer. Head & neck. 2016;38(4):601-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23939
Küçükdurmaz F. Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement. ABJS. 2015;3(3):168.
Haghshenas. Evaluation of Public Publishers' Websites Using the ABC Tool. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Humanities and Management, Imam Reza University. 2012
Nasajpour MRA-r, Hasan; Soleymani, Mohammad Reza; Shahrzadi, Leila;, Hassanzadeh. Evaluation of the quality of the college library websites in Iranian medical Universities based on the Stover model. J Edu Health Promot. 2014;3:121.https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.145931
Amin poor F. How to Improve Webometric Ranks of Iranian Medical Universities. Journal of Isfahan Medical School 2011;127(29):115.
Samadbeik M. Health Information on the Internet: Quality, Importance, and Popularity of Persian Health Websites. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16 (4). https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12866 PMid:24910795 PMCid:PMC4028768
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 1
March 2020
Pages 25-36

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics