Proactive Teaching: Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate Constructivist Teaching in Higher Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Psychology and Consulting, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Educational Psychology, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Constructivist teaching is deemed beneficial across most educational contexts, and is particularly valued and utilized in tertiary settings. Yet to date, no tools have been made available for measuring and evaluating the construct.This study aimed at developing and validating a scale to evaluate the proactive teaching (based on Constructivism) in higher education. Methods: The present research is an exploratory mixed methodology. The statistical population of the present study included all students of psychology, education, social sciences, medicine and management of University of Tehran during the 2015-16 academic years. The first phase of the research involved developing a tool within a framework of qualitative methodology and phenomenology based on semi-structured interviews collected from 100 students selected through purposeful sampling. The second phase incorporated the data collected from 500 students selected by stratified random sampling to validate the six-dimension scale through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The result was the conceptualization of six dimensions of active learning: self-organization, constructivism, cognitive involvement, participation and cooperation, teacher as facilitator, and constructivist evaluation. The results showed that the Proactive Teaching Scale (which includes 6 components and 42 items) has adequate properties to evaluate this teaching method in higher education explaining 53.48% of the total variance. Ordinal Theta coefficient (0.86 - 0.92) indicated good internal validity. Conclusion: The Proactive Teaching Scale provides a valuable tool to evaluate constructivist teaching, and contributes to improved teaching and learning practices in higher education.

Keywords

References

Piaget J. Piaget’s theory. Handbook of child psychology. 1983; 1(4).
Shunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, © 2012.
Doyle JK. The cognitive psychology of systems thinking. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society. 1997 Sep; 13(3):253-65.https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-
Huitt W. Constructivism. Educational psychology interactive. Retrieved April. 2003; 2:2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963848.n51
Vygotsky LS. Tool and sign in the development of the child. The collected works of LS Vygotsky. 1999; 6:3-68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4833-1_4
Bruner J. The process of education. 1960, Cambridge: Harvard UP. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090108
Bruner JS. Acts of meaning. Harvard university press; 1990. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700030555
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Bromley P. Active learning strategies for diverse learning styles: Simulations are only one method. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2013 Oct; 46(4):818-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096513001145
Snowman J, McCown R. Psychology applied to teaching. Nelson Education; 2011. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993 Psychology Applied to Teaching https://doi.org/10.1037/0011198
Aviram A. Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. In Conflicting Philosophies of Education in Israel/Palestine 2000 (pp. 103-127). Springer, Dordrecht.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1137-1_7
Van de Walle JA. Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1 Jacob Way, Reading, MA 01867; toll-free; 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/s073093840002493x
Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Gielen S. On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction. 2006 Aug 1; 16(4):279-94.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001
El Asmar JP, Mady C. A constructivist approach to design teaching at the postgraduate level: The case of an interdisciplinary design programme at FAAD, NDU, Lebanon. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013 Oct 21; 93:531-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.234
Brynen R. (Ending) civil war in the classroom: A peacebuilding simulation. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2010 Jan;43(1):145- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096510990719
Waring M, Evans C. Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Routledge; 2014 Oct-  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315540382
Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104; 1993.
Bromley P. Active learning strategies for diverse learning styles: Simulations are only one method. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2013 Oct; 46(4):818-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096513001145
Killian M, Bastas H. The effects of an active learning strategy on students' attitudes and students' performances in introductory sociology classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2015 Jun; 15(3):53-67. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.12960
Parmar D, Trotter E. Keeping our students: identifying factors that influence student withdrawal and strategies to enhance the experience and retention of first-year students. Learning & Teaching in the Social Sciences. 2004 Nov 1;1(3). https://doi.org/10.1386/ltss.1.3.149/0
Pedersen DE. Active and collaborative learning in an undergraduate sociological theory course. Teaching Sociology. 2010 Jul; 38(3):197-206.https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x10370119
Stewart AC, Houghton SM, Rogers PR. Instructional design, active learning, and student performance: Using a trading room to teach strategy. Journal of Management Education. 2012 Dec; 36(6):753-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912456295
Rolloff M. A constructivist model for teaching evidence-based practice. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2010 Sep 1;31(5):290-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024776-201301000-00003
Shroff RH, Ting FS, Lam WH. Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ perceptions of technology-enabled active learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2019 Jan 6. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4472
Huang HM, Liaw SS. An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches.International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2018;19(1).
Ronnie, H. Sh and Fridolin, S. Th, T (2019) https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503
Machumu H, Zhu C. The relationship between student conceptions of constructivist learning and their engagement in constructivist based blended learning environments. International Journal of Learning Technology. 2017; 12(3):253-72. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlt.2017.088408
Lim DH, Tschopp-Harris K. Inverted Constructivism to Leverage Mobile-Technology-Based Active Learning. In Handbook of Research on Mobile Technology, Constructivism, and Meaningful Learning 2018 (pp. 240-258). IGI Global https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3949-0.ch013
Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall JP. Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing; 1996.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7).
Velazquez L, Munguia N, Sanchez M. Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2005 Dec 1;6(4):383-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510623865
Herrington J, Oliver R. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational technology research and development. 2000 Sep 1; 48(3):23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02319856
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 1
March 2020
Pages 1-12

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics