Comparing Two Forms of Spatial Contiguity Principle in Student Learning: 'Text Linked to Image' versus 'Text in Image Adjacency'

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanites, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

3 Department of Higher Education, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of English Language, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Using links to provide additional audio or video content can enhance learners’ engagement with the learning content and keep them active in the learning process. This study aimed to compare the impacts of two different forms of multimedia presentation, namely ‘text in image adjacency’ and ‘text linked to image’, on learning and retention in a course entitled the Sciences. Methods: This was a randomized trial research. Multi-stage cluster sampling was used to select 31 fourth grade elementary school students in Malayer (Iran) in the 2014-2015 academic year. They were randomly assigned to control (N=15) and intervention (N=16) groups. Three researcher-made achievement tests (pre-test, post-test, retention test) were used to collect data. The expert opinions of seven teachers were consulted to assess the validity of the questions and the CVR of their opinions was found to be 98%. The reliability was determined using Cronbach’s alpha as well as the raters’ opinions, and the coefficients stood at 73%, 85%, and 60%, respectively. Also, Multimedia software was used to prepare the content of chapter 12 (Circulatory System) for the experiment. It was presented to the students in two forms: text linked to image (hidden hyperlink) and text in image adjacency. The control group was provided with text in image adjacency and the intervention group with text linked to image (hidden hyperlink). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, repeated measures ANOVA, F, and ANCOVA tests in SPSS 19 software. Results: The research findings showed that in the group in which multimedia content was presented with text linked to image, learning scores significantly increased from (5.28±3.74) in the pre-test to (11.36±3.98) in the post-test and (12.40±4.44) in the retention test (P=0.001). Also, in the control group receiving multimedia content in the form of text in image adjacency, learning values also significantly increased from (3.70±3.64) in the pre-test to (10.46±4.77) in the post-test and (12.60±3.62) in the retention test (P=0.001). However, there was no difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of learning gains (F(1, 27)=0.014, P=0.906). Similarly, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of learning retention (F(1, 24)=0.292, P=0.594). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that a new form of spatial contiguity (i.e., text linked to image via hyperlinks) is as effective in learning as presenting textual content in image adjacency. This is a new finding contributing to the development of spatial contiguity principle.

Keywords

References

Mayer RE. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning of multimedia learning. Second edition, New York: Cambridge university press; 2014. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.
Ghamin Kh, Norouzi D. The Impact of Multimedia on Learning and Retention of Persian Pre-Printing Skills Course in First Graders. Educational Psychology, 2013; 8(24):120 -145. http://jep.atu.ac.ir/ article_2439.html.
Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons; 2016 Mar 21.
Bauhoff V, Huff M, Schwan S. Distance matters: Spatial contiguity effects as tradeoff between gaze switches and memory load. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2012 Nov; 26(6):863-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ acp.2887.
Leahy W, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2011 Nov; 25(6):943-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1787.
Young JQ, Sewell JL. Applying cognitive load theory to medical education: construct and measurement challenges. Perspectives on medical education. 2015 Jun 1; 4(3):107-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40037-015-0193-9.
Moreno R. Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2007 Sep; 21(6):765-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ acp.1348.
She HC, Chen YZ. The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education. 2009 Dec 1; 53(4):1297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2009.06.012.
Holsanova J, Holmberg N, Holmqvist K. Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2009 Dec; 23(9):1215-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1525.
Davies W, Cormican K. An analysis of the use of multimedia technology in computer aided design training: Towards effective design goals. Procedia Technology. 2013 Jan 1; 9:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. protcy.2013.12.022.
Wouters P, Paas F, van Merrienboer JJ. How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 2008; 78(3):645-75. https://doi. org/10.3102%2F0034654308320320.
Ayres P, Paas F. Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012; 26(6):827-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2882.
Paas F, Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2014; 27:27-42. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.004.
Mayer RE, Moreno R. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational psychology review, 2002; 14(1): 87-99.‏ https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2020
Pages 84-91

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics