The Competencies Expected of Instructors in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Curriculum Planning, University of Hormozgan, Hormozgan, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, University of Hormozgan, Hormozgan, Iran

3 Educational Technology in Medical Sciences, Virtual University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the instructor competencies required for teaching in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). A qualitative approach was applied to achieve this objective. Methods: Qualitative-inductive content analysis was used to identify the competencies of instructors in MOOCs. For this purpose, the articles related to the competence of instructors in MOOCs courses were first collected and the units of analysis were determined. In this respect, purposeful sampling and research criteria were applied to select 31 units from a total of 173 articles extracted from valid scientific databases. Data inclusion criteria limited the search to the articles with relevant topics published between 2006 and 2019. Reputable Persian and international databases were searched for the relevant data until theoretical data saturation was reached. An assessment of applicability and transferability was performed for data validation. Finally, the main categories were distinguished from the sub-categories, and a conceptual model was designed for identifying teachers’ competence in MOOCs. Results: The four main categories of competency obtained from data analysis were as follows: knowledge competencies (Dimension of Knowledge), professional skills (Instructional Content Development, Instructional Design, Evaluation, Communication, Participatory, Management, and Technical Skills), Professional attitude skills (Motivational and Emotional Skills) and the personality dimension of the instructors. Conclusion: This study draws out the possible implications of developing a curriculum in view of instructors’ competence in MOOCs with the goal of providing a comprehensive perspective on their performance in such courses.

Keywords

References

Liyanagunawardena TR, Adams AA, Williams SA. MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2013;14(3):202-27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439
Chang RI, Hung YH, Lin CF. Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;46(3):528-41. https:// doi.org/10 . 1 1 11/bjet.12275
Belleflamme P, Jacqmin J. An Economic Appraisal of MOOC Platforms: Business Models and  Impacts on Higher Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.2537270.
Zhou M. Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education. 2016;92:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons. 2016;59(4):441-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
Lin J. A New Definition of MOOCs: Arising from Influential MOOCs Research between 2008 and 2018.2019.
Kulkarni C, Wei KP, Le H, Chia D, Papadopoulos K, Cheng J, et al. Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact. 2013;20(6):Article 33. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2505057.
Houshmandi S, Rezaei E, Hatami J, Molaei B. E-learning readiness among faculty members of medical sciences universities and provide strategies to improve it. Res Dev. 2019;8(2):2. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2019.020
Gulbahar Y, Kalelioglu F. Competencies for e-Instructors: How to Qualify and Guarantee Sustainability. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. 2015 06/01;6:140-54. https://doi.org/ 10.30935/cedtech/6145
Dunlap J. Workload Reduction in Online Courses: Getting Some Shuteye. Performance Improvement. 2005 05/01;44:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440 507
Wilson BG, Ludwig-Hardman S, Thornam CL, Dunlap JC. Bounded Community: Designing and Facilitating Learning Communities in Formal Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2004 ;5(3). https://doi.org/ 10.19173/irrodl.v5i3.204.
Palloff RM, Pratt K. The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2003.
Levy S. Six Factors to Consider When Planning Online Distance Learning Programs in Higher Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2003;6.
Houston WR, Howsam RB. Competency-based teacher education: progress, problems, and prospects: Science Research Associates; 1972.
Varvel VE, Jr. Master Online Teacher Competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Spr 2007:N/A.
Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M. Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction is Not Enough. American Journal of Distance Education. 2005:v19 n3 p133-48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Keyek-Franssen D. MOOCs and the scaling of postsecondary education. The Evolllution. 2017:Retrieved from https://evolllution.com/revenue-streams/distance_online_learning/moocs-and-thescaling-of-postsecondary-education/.
Yousef AMF, Chatti MA, Schroeder U, Wosnitza M. What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In Proceedingsof Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), . 2014:2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on, pp;44-48. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICALT.2014.23.
Ferreira J. OER and the future of publishing [Web log post]. EdSurge. (2014, August 10):Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2014-08-10-oer-and-the-future-of-publishing.
Margaryan A, Bianco M, Littlejohn A. Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education. 2015:80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Rezaei E, Zaraii Zavaraki E, Hatami J, Ali Abadi K, Delavar A. The effect of moocs instructional design model-based on student’s learning and motivation. Man In India 2017; 97(11): 115-26.
Breslow L, Pritchard D, DeBoer J, Stump G, Ho A, Seaton D. Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom: Research into edX's First MOOC. Research in Practice and Assessment. 2013.
Emanuel, Ej. Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature. 2013:503.342,(7476). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/503342a
Rezaei E, Nili M, Fardanesh H, Shahalizadeh M. Qualitative Content Analysis of Connectivism Theory and Introducing a Conceptual Model of Learning Ecology Design. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2020;5(1):33-45.
Kop R. The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2011 ;12(3):19-38. https://doi.org/ 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
Zhu M, Sari A, Lee MM. A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education. 2018:37, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002
Blackmon S. MOOC makers: Professors’ experiences with developing and delivering MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2018:19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl. v19i4.3718
Cohen A, Holstein S. Analysing successful massive open online courses using the community of inquiry model as perceived by students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2018;34(5):544-56. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jcal.12259.
Hew KF. Unpacking the strategies of ten highly rated MOOCs: implications for engaging students in large online courses. Teachers College Record. 2018:120(1), 1–40.
Foon HK. Promoting engagement in online courses:What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/bjet.12235
Lee. WS, R. WW, Jennifer. R, Jamie. L. Instructor’s Use of Social Presence, Teaching Presence, and Attitudinal Dissonance: A Case Study of an Attitudinal Change MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2016. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379
Zheng S, Wisniewski P, Beth Rosson M, M. Carroll J. Ask the Instructors: Motivations and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses. CSCW '16, FEBRUARY 27–MARCH2, 2016, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820082
Berge ZL. The role of the online instructor/facilitator. Educational Technology. 1995:35(1), 22-30.
Al-Hunaiyyan A, Al-Sharhan S, Al-Sharhan H. A new instructional competency model: towards an effective e-learning system and environment. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science. 2012:5, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdim.2012.6360142
Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J. Engaging with Massive Online Courses. WWW 2014 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/2566486.2568042.
Kizilcec RF, Piech C, Schneider E. Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 2013: (pp. 170–179). https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Hsiu-Fang H, Sarah E. Sh. Three  Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research.2005.https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Bremer C. FIT FOR E-LEARNING? TRAININGS FOR E-LEARNING COMPETENCIES. Retrieved on 15 May 2013 from http://wwwstudiumdigitaleuni-frankfurtde/veroeffentlichungen/documents/edulearn2010_1pdf. 2010:5738-47.
ASTD. The ASTD competency model 2013 . Retrieved on 15 May 2013 from http://www.astd. org/ Certification/Competency-Model.
Anjos silva  EMV. Pedagogic Comoetency of the Brazilian University Professor. available at: http://www/aareeduau/01pap/si10189htm. 2010.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2020
Pages 69-83

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics