Teaching Histology in the Age of Virtual Microscopy and E-Resources: Is a Tailored Approach to Domestic and International Students Warranted?

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Abstract

Background: Individuals’ learning habits and associated challenges in medical education have rarely been studied in the present digital era. We investigated if a tailored instructional approach is needed for domestic and international students studying histology. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was performed in May 2019 at the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Census method was applied, and a validated researcher-made questionnaire was distributed among all students attending histology courses. We collected 192 evaluable questionnaires from Czech students and 61 from international students. Differences in opinions between the two groups were tested using Fisher´s exact and chi-square test. Results: Compared to their domestic peers, international students were less reliant on printed textbooks (6.9% vs. 17.3%), while showing greater interest in materials from lectures (35.3% vs. 9.2%) (p <0.0001). They were also more inclined to use virtual microscopy only (p <0.0001), and unlike their Czech counterparts, they preferred to study in small groups rather than alone (35.5% vs. 4.7%) (p <0.0001). As for the theoretical knowledge acquired in high school, international students were less prepared than Czech students (P=0.0218). Most international students (62.3%) welcomed preparatory courses aimed at solidifying their knowledge of basic sciences in advance of medical studies. However, no differences in opinions on the use of resources were found between native and non-native English speakers (P=0.6506). Domestic as well as international students experienced very similar problems when studying histology. All students appreciated taking interactive tests to assess their practical and theoretical knowledge. Conclusion: Despite the introduction of modern digital technologies such as a Virtual Microscopy in histology courses, a tailored approach to different groups of students is needed.

Keywords

References

Dixon D. Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2012;112(4):175-81.
Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. Bmj. 2002;324(7343):952-7. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952  PMid:11964342 PMCid:PMC102330
Smith SR. Effect of undergraduate college major on performance in medical school. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1998;73(9):1006-8. doi:10.1097/00001888-199809000-00023  PMid:9759107
Tektas OY, Fiessler C, Mayr A, Neuhuber W, Paulsen F. Correlation of high school exam grades with study success at a German medical school. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education. 2013;1(3):157-62. doi:10.5455/jcme.20130311114703
Dickman RL, Sarnacki RE, Schimpfhauser FT, Katz LA. Medical students from natural science and nonscience undergraduate backgrounds. Similar academic performance and residency selection. Jama. 1980;243(24):2506-9. doi:10.1001/jama.1980.03300500032024  PMid:7382038
Huff KL, Fang D. When are students most at risk of encountering academic difficulty? A study of the 1992 matriculants to U.S. medical schools. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1999;74(4):454-60. doi:10.1097/00001888-199904000-00047 PMid:10219232
Przyłęcki P. International Students at the Medical University of Łódź: Adaptation Challenges and Culture Shock Experienced in a Foreign Country. Central and Eastern European Migration Review. 2018;7(2):209-32.
Hortsch M. Virtual biology: teaching histology in the age of Facebook. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2013;27(2):411-3. doi:10.1096/fj.13-0201ufm  PMid:23371963
Khogali SE, Davies DA, Donnan PT, Gray A, Harden RM, McDonald J, et al. Integration of e-learning resources into a medical school curriculum. Medical teacher. 2011;33(4):311-8. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.540270  PMid:21456989
Kroncke KD. Computer-based learning versus practical course in pre-clinical education: acceptance and knowledge retention. Medical teacher. 2010;32(5):408-13. doi:10.3109/01421590903394611  PMid:20423260
Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Brauer L. Virtual microscopy-The future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft. 2010;192(6):378-82. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2010.09.008  PMid:20971623
Coleman R. Can histology and pathology be taught without microscopes? The advantages and disadvantages of virtual histology. Acta histochemica. 2009;111(1):1-4. doi:10.1016/j.acthis.2008.09.003  PMid:19004481
Heidger PM, Jr., Erkonen W, Kreiter C, Pelsang R. Innovative testing method for an integrated radiology-histology curriculum. The Anatomical record. 2002;269(2):113-7. doi:10.1002/ar.10077 PMid:12001218
Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD, Braun MW. Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anatomical sciences education. 2009;2(5):218-26. doi:10.1002/ase.105 PMid:19743410
Krippendorf BB, Lough J. Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anatomical record Part B, New anatomist. 2005;285(1):19-25. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20066  PMid:16032757
Kumar RK, Freeman B, Velan GM, De Permentier PJ. Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anatomical record Part B, New anatomist. 2006;289(4):128-33. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20105  PMid:16865702
Lei LW, Winn W, Scott C, Farr A. Evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in histology: effect of interaction on learning outcome. Anatomical record Part B, New anatomist. 2005;284(1):28-34. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20062  PMid:15898077
Rosas C, Rubi R, Donoso M, Uribe S. Dental students' evaluations of an interactive histology software. Journal of dental education. 2012;76(11):1491-6. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.11.tb05411.x  PMid:23144485
Triola MM, Holloway WJ. Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC medical education. 2011;11(1):4. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-4  PMid:21269474 PMCid:PMC3037351
Barlett JE, Kotrlik J, Higgins C. Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal. 2001;19.
Johnson S, Purkiss J, Holaday L, Selvig D, Hortsch M. Learning histology - dental and medical students' study strategies. European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe. 2015;19(2):65-73. doi:10.1111/eje.12104  PMid:24809952
Higazi TB. Use of interactive live digital imaging to enhance histology learning in introductory level anatomy and physiology classes. Anatomical sciences education. 2011;4(2):78-83. doi:10.1002/ase.211  PMid:21387567
Holaday L, Selvig D, Purkiss J, Hortsch M. Preference of Interactive Electronic Versus Traditional Learning Resources by University of Michigan Medical Students during the First Year Histology Component. Medical Science Educator. 2013;23(4):607-19. doi:10.1007/BF03341688
Yiping L, Philip CA, Sylvia dA. Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2001;71(3):449-521. doi:10.3102/00346543071003449
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 12, Issue 2
June 2021
Pages 97-105

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 January 2021
  • Revise Date: 16 March 2021
  • Accept Date: 20 April 2021
  • Publish Date: 01 June 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics