The Design Principles of 3D-Virtual Reality Learning Environment (3D-VRLE) in Science Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Instructional and Learning Technologies, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-khodh, Oman

2 Department of Instructional and Learning Technologies, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khodh, Oman

Abstract

Background: 3D-Virtual Reality Learning Environments (3D-VRLEs) have proven effective in stimulating student engagement in teaching and learning processes. However, some principles should be considered before introducing and implementing these learning environments in science education. This paper aims to document the principles that guide the design and development of the 3D-VRLE in science education and to draw the implications for the Omani educational context. Methods: A design-based research (DBR) methodology was conducted to gather data using two instruments: literature review and semi-structured interviews. One specialist developer and two Subject Matter Experts were selected for interviews using purposeful sampling. The in-person interviews consisted of seven questions and a three-hour discussion. The questions were centered on the technological features of 3D-VRLE applications, the instructional design process used to develop these educational applications, and the design principles used in their development. Keywords used for the literature review included biology, physics, chemistry, science, DBR, 3D-virtual reality, lab, and learning environment. Inductive thematic analysis was used as a technique for analyzing the interview data. Results: The findings pointed to a systematic and planned design process for 3D-VRLE in accordance with the ADDIE model. It was found that the design principles of the 3D-VRLE should include authentic and instructionally grounded systems, a collaborative and motivating environment, and student-centered instruction. Conclusion: 3D-VRLEs may have significant implications for the teaching of science in terms of the physical arrangement of classrooms, the way the teacher delivers the topic, the number of students in the classroom, and the type of technology that needs to be adopted in schools. This study presented the blueprints required by Omani science curriculum designers for the design/development of 3D-VRLE. This allows them to take the initiative in design and production of relevant learning materials and products and use them effectively in the educational context of Oman.

Keywords

References

Lin MT, Wang JS, Kuo HM, Luo Y. A study on the effect of virtual reality 3D exploratory education on students’ creativity and leadership. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017;13(7), 3151-3161. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00709a
Borsci S, Lawson G, Broome S. Empirical evidence, evaluation criteria and challenges for the effectiveness of virtual and mixed reality tools for training operators of car service maintenance. Comput Ind. 2015 Feb 1;67:17-26. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2014.12.002
Alqahtani AS, Daghestani LF, Ibrahim LF. Environments and system types of virtual reality technology in STEM: A survey. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl (IJACSA). 2017;8(6). doi:10.14569/ IJACSA.2017.080610 
Matsui H, Terence C. The affordances of 3d virtual learning environments: designing for learners’ interpersonal and emotional connections. Virtual Reality in Education: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2019, pp. 106-123. doi:10.4018/978-1-52258179-6.ch005
Liu R, Wang L, Lei J, Wang Q, Ren Y. Effects of an immersive virtual realitybased classroom on students’ learning performance in science lessons. Br J Educ Technol. 2020; 51(6), 2034-2049. doi:10.1111/bjet.13028
Sarac H. Benefits and challenges of using second life in English teaching: experts’ opinions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 158. 326-330. doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2014.12.095
Durukan A, Artun H, Temur A. Virtual Reality in Science Education: A Descriptive Review. Journal of Science Learning. 2020;3(3):132-42. doi:10.17509/ jsl.v3i3.21906
Bonner E, Reinders H. Augmented and virtual reality in the language classroom: Practical ideas. Teaching English with Technology. 2018;18(3):33-53. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1186392.pdf
Freina L, Ott M. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, 2015; Vol. 1, 133. https://www. researchgate.net/profile/Laura-Freina/ALiterature-Review-on-Immersive-VirtualReality-in-Education-State-Of-The-Artand-Perspectives.pdf   
Beaumont C, Savin-Baden M, Conradi E, Poulton T. Evaluating a Second Life Problem-Based Learning (PBL) demonstrator project: what can we learn?. Interactive Learning Environments. 2014 Jan 2;22(1):125-41. doi:10.1080/10494820 .2011.641681
Beck D, Perkins R. Review of educational research methods in desktop virtual world environments: Framing the past to provide future direction. J Virtual Worlds Res. 2014 Jan 19;7(1). doi:10.4101/jvwr. v7i1.7077 
Al-Azawi R, Shakkah M. Embedding augmented and virtual reality in educational learning method: present and future, Paper presented at the Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), 2018; 9th International Conference on (Irbid), 218–222. doi:10.1109/ IACS.2018.8355470
Kapp KM. Principles for Creating a Successful Virtual Reality Learning Experience. 2017; January 7. Available from: https://karlkapp.com/principlesfor-creating-a-successful-virtual-realitylearning-experience
Shattuck J, Anderson T. Using a designbased research study to identify principles for training instructors to teach online. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2013; 14(5), 186-210. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1626
Reeves TC, Herrington J, Oliver R. Design-based research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. J Comput High Educ. 2005; 16(2), 97-116. doi:10.1007/BF02961476 
Aldoobie N. ADDIE model. Am Int J Contemp Res. 2015; 5(6), 68-72. Available from: http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/ Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
Battou A, Baz O, Mammass D. Learning design approaches for designing virtual learning environments. Communications on Applied Electronics, 2016; 5(9), 31-37. doi:10.5120/cae2016652369
Ben Ouahi M, Ait Hou M, Bliya A, Hassouni T, Ibrahmi A, Mehdi E. The Effect of Using Computer Simulation on Students’ Performance in Teaching and Learning Physics: Are There Any Gender and Area Gaps?. Educ Res Int. 2021 Mar 23;2021. doi:10.1155/2021/6646017
Homer B, Plass J. Level of interactivity and executive functions as predictors of learning in computer-based chemistry simulations. Comput Human Behav. 2014; 36, 365-375. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.041
McKenney S, Reeves TC. Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educ Res. 2013; 42(2), 97-100. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463781
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 12, Issue 4
December 2021
Pages 238-249

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics