A Literature Review of the Effects of Virtual Community of Practice on Medical Education in China (2013-2023)

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

2 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

3 Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China

Abstract

Background: Given the rapid development of technologies, virtual community of practice (VCoP) has been employed across various fields, including education. In this context, it is essential to identify the utilization of virtual community of practice in medical education settings in China, particularly its effects on teaching methods and student learning. By understanding the effects of the virtual community of practice on college medical education, we can better evaluate the feasibility of introducing this technology to universities in economically disadvantaged areas. To this end, this study reviewed the literature to identify the potential benefits and challenges of implementing a virtual community of practice in the Chinese context and provide insights into how such an initiative can be effectively designed and implemented.
Methods: To identify the effects of the virtual community of practice on teaching and learning in Chinese medical education settings, we searched multiple databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the University of Manchester Online Library. We focused on peer-reviewed English-language publications on virtual technology and medical education from 2013 to 2023. 
Results: In Chinese medical education, traditional face-to-face teaching remains the primary instructional approach. This is understandable, considering that supplying a costly virtual community of practice to each student might be impractical, particularly for universities in economically disadvantaged areas. Nevertheless, the literature reviewed in this study suggests that if the virtual community of practice are employed appropriately, it can significantly enhance teaching by substantially reducing the budget required for constructing realistic medical scenarios.
Conclusion: To effectively promote the virtual community of practice for universities in economically disadvantaged areas, we advocated for establishing a dedicated medical education volunteer association as a form of the virtual community of practice to support medical education, which is enhanced by the virtual community of practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Cardinal L, Kaell, A. The role of medical education in the development of the scientific practice of medicine. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2017; 7(1): 58–60. doi:10.1080/20009666.2017.1286815
  2. Karimian Z, Farrokhi MR, Moghadami M, et al. Medical education and COVID-19 pandemic: a crisis management model towards an evolutionary pathway. Education and Information Technologies. 2022; 27(3): 3299-3320. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10697-8.
  3. Kian L, Zarifsanaiey N, karimian Z. Effect of the e-flipped learning approach on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceived behaviour of medical educators. BMC Research Notes. 2022; 15(1): 1-6. doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06119-8
  4. Schleifer TJ, Verrier MC, Landry MD. (2014). What do we know about knowledge brokers in paediatric rehabilitation? A systematic search and narrative summary. Physiotherapy Canada. 2014; 66(2): 143-152. doi:10.3138/ptc.2012-71.
  5. Wu A. Reshaping internationalization of medical education in 2023. BMC medical education. 2023; 23(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04374-2.
  6. Frenk J, Chen L C, Chandran L, Groff E, King R, Meleis A, Finebery H. Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2022; 400(10362): 1539-1556. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02092-X.
  7. Linkewich E, et al. Using a virtual community of practice to support stroke best practice implementation: Mixed methods evaluation. JMIR Formative Research, 2022; 6(4): 1-11. doi:10.2196/31827.
  8. Habib MN, Jamal W, Khalil U, Khan Z. Transforming universities in interactive digital platform: case of city university of science and information technology. Education and Information Technologies. 2021; 26(1): 517–541. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10237-w.
  9. Sood A, Assad N, Jarrell W, Kalishman S, Le Suer K, Murillo S, et al. A virtual community-of-practice approach by rural stakeholders in managing pneumoconiosis in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis. Rural and Remote Health. 2020; 20(3):5784–5784. doi:10.22605/RRH5784.
  10. Jiang H, Islam AA, Gu X, Spector JM. Online learning satisfaction in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional comparison between Eastern and Western Chinese universities. Education and Information Technologies. 2021; 26(6): 6747–6769. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10519-x.
  11. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 1998; 9(5):1-10. https://participativelearning.org/pluginfile.php/636/mod_resource/content/3/Learningasasocialsystem.pdf.
  12. Dubé L, Bourhis A, Jacob R. The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2005; 18(2): 145-166. doi:10.1108/09534810510589570.
  13. Mussoi E, Flores M, Behar P. Comunidades virtuais – un novo espaço de aprendizagem [Internet]. IX Ciclo Palestras sobre Novas Tecnol na Educ. 2007. [cited 2020 Mar 13]. http://www.cinted.ufrgs.br/ciclo9/artigos/8aEunice.pdf.
  14. Probst G, Borzillo S. Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal. 2008; 26(5): 335-347. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
  15. Wang W. Medical education in China: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future. BMC Medical Education. 2021; 21(1):1-6. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02875-6.
  16. Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. Seven principles for cultivating communities of practice. Cultivating Communities of Practice: a guide to managing knowledge. 2002; 4:1-9. https://www.clearwatervic.com.au/user-data/resource-files/7Principles_Community-of-Practice.pdf
  17. Hurtubise K, Pratte G, Rivard L, Berbari J, Héguy L, Camden C. Exploring engagement in a virtual community of practice in pediatric rehabilitation: who are non-users, lurkers, and posters? Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019; 41(8): 983–990. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1416496.
  18. Davis D, Davis ME, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, et al. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ, 2003; 327(7405): 33-35. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33
  19. Agrawal A, Joshi K, editors. A Review of Community of Practice in Organizations: Key Findings and Emerging Themes. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2011; 1-10. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.26.
  20. Li N, Zhang X, Limniou M. A country’s national culture affects virtual learning environment adoption in higher education: A systematic review (2001–2020). Interactive Learning Environments. 2021; 1-19. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1967408
  21. Bryant A, K. C. The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. SAGE; 2019.
  22. Hou J, Michaud C, Li Z, Dong Z, Sun B, Zhang J, et al. Transformation of the education of health professionals in China: progress and challenges. The Lancet. 2014; 384(9945): 819-827. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61307-6.
  23. Han SY, Kim HY, Lim JH, Cheon J, Kwon YK, Kim H, et al. The past, present, and future of traditional medicine education in Korea. Integrative Medicine Research. 2016; 5(2): 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.003.
  24. Probst G, Borzillo S. Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal. 2008; 26(5): 335–347. doi:0.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
  25. Russell J, Greenhalgh T, Boynton P, Rigby M. Soft networks for bridging the gap between research and practice: Illuminative evaluation of Chain. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449): 1-6. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1174.
  26. Bermejo-Caja CJ, Koatz D, Orrego C, Perestelo-Pérez L, González-González AI, Ballester M, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a virtual community of practice to primary care professionals regarding patient empowerment: A qualitative pilot study. BMC Health Services Research. 2019; 19(1): 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4185-z
  27. McLoughlin C, Patel KD, O’Callaghan T, Reeves S. The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: findings from an integrated review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2018; 32(2): 136-142. doi:10.1080/13561820.2017.1377692.
  28. Barnett S, Jones SC, Bennett S, Iverson D, Robinson L. A virtual community of practice for general practice training: A preimplementation survey. JMIR Medical Education. 2016; 2(2): 1-12. doi:10.2196/mededu.5318
  29. MacWalter G, McKay J, Bowie P. Utilisation of internet resources for continuing professional development: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Scotland. BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16: 1-9. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0540-5.
  30. Wenger E, McDermott R, WM. S. Seven principles for cultivating communities of practice. Cultivating Communities of Practice: a guide to managing knowledge. 2002; 4:1-9. https://www.clearwatervic.com.au/user-data/resource-files/7Principles_Community-of-Practice.pdf
  31. Barnett S, Jones SC, Bennett S, Iverson D, Bonney A. Perceptions of family physician trainees and trainers regarding the usefulness of a virtual community of practice. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013; 15(5): 1-12. doi:10.2196/jmir.2555
  32. Preece J. Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers. 1999; 12(1): 63-77. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00056-3
  33. Ardichvili A, Page V, Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2003; 7(1): 64-77. doi:10.1108/13673270310463626
  34. Barnett S, Jones SC, Caton T, Iverson D, Bennett S, Robinson L. Implementing a virtual community of practice for family physician training: a mixed-methods case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014; 16(3): 1-14. doi:10.2196/jmir.3083
  35. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2010; 27(1): 2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-1842.2010.00883.x
  36. Li N, Huijser H, Xi Y, Limniou M, Zhang X, Kek MYCA. Disrupting the disruption: A digital learning HeXie ecology model. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(2): 63. doi:10.3390/educsci12020063
  37. Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016; 18(6): 1-19. doi:10.2196/jmir.5312
  38. Li N, Zhang X, Limniou M, Xi Y. Meaning-making in virtual learning environment enabled educational innovations: A 13-year longitudinal case study. Interactive Learning Environments. 2022; 1-15. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2081582
  39. Edelmann N. Reviewing the definitions of “lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2013; 16(9): 645-649. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0362
  40. Aromataris E, Pearson A. The literature review: An Overview. AJN, American Journal of Nursing. 2014; 114(3): 53-58. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c
  41. Alexander PA. Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality literature reviews. Review of Educational Research. 2020; 90(1): 6–23. doi:10.3102/0034654319854352
  42. H. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London, England: SAGE; 2018.
  43. Lalloo C, Osei-Twum J-A, Rapoport A, Vadeboncoeur C, Weingarten K, Veldhuijzen van Zanten S, et al. Pediatric project ECHO: A virtual community of practice to improve palliative care knowledge and self-efficacy among interprofessional health care providers. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2021; 24(7): 136-1044. doi:10.1089/jpm.2020.0496
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 3 - Serial Number 54
September 2023
Pages 169-180

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics