Unethical Use of Information Technology in Higher Educational Institutions: A Case Study of a Faith-Based University in Ghana

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Pentecost University Box KN 1739, Kaneshie, Accra

Abstract

Background: This study examined the unethical use of information technology among students in a Faith-based higher educational institution in Ghana. The choice of a Faith-based higher-level institution was based on the moral values and strict religious code of conduct inscribed in the culture of the university. 
Methods: A cross-sectional primary data used for analysis was gathered from June to July 2021. The choice of a cross-sectional was to compare the perspectives of the gender, age groups, and economic levels among various students in the university. A structured questionnaire was provided online for students willing to participate in the study to complete and submit online. A sample size of 574 students answered the closed ended online questionnaire for data analysis. Gender and education level were used to assess the primary reasons for the unethical use of information technology by students. SPSS software version 21 was used for data analysis.
Results: Students who participated in the study were 239 males (42.5) and 324 females (57.5). Among some of the reasons for unethical behavior was easier access to information technology which enabled the students to engage in wrong activities (mean score 3.11, standard deviation 1.154). Students with financial support were less likely not to be involved in IT to perform well (mean score 3.00, standard deviation 1.169). The students working and studying at the same time had less time to study and resorted to unethical use of IT (mean score 3.26, standard deviation1.050). 
Conclusion: This study recommends that universities should teach ethics of information technology as a stand-alone course, and that higher-level institutions should periodically present academic seminars on unethical use of information technology. 

Keywords

References

  1. Dutton WH, Cheong P, Park N. An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of a virtual learning environment. Prometheus. 2004; 22(2), 131–149. doi: 10.1080/0810902042000218337.
  2. Al-Emran M, Elsherif HM, Shaalan K. Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;56, 93-102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033.
  3. Koch F, Assuncao M, Netto M. A cost analysis of cloud computing for education, springer, Berlin. doi:10.1603/EC11270.
  4. Stuckelberger C. Ethics in higher education. Globethics.net, Geneva; 2017. doi:10.1108/030905997.
  5. Mdlongwa T. Information and communication technology (Information Technology) as a means of enhancing education in schools in South Africa: Challenges, benefits and recommendations. Africa Institute of South Africa, Johannesburg; 2012. doi:10.5897/ERR2019.3777
  6. Duarte M. Formative assessment in b-learning: Effectively monitoring students learning. Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems in Enhancing Multiculturality. 2014; TEEM’14, Salamanca, October 1-3, pp.1-6. doi:10.1002/bit.25266.
  7. Alshwaier A, Youssef A, Emam A. A new trend for e-learning in KSA using educational clouds. Advanced Computing: An international Journal. 2012;3(1), 81-97. doi:10.5121/acj.3107.
  8. Straw D. The plagiarism of generation ‘why not? Community College Week. 2002;14(24): 4-7. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.320.
  9. Whiteman SA, Gordon JI. The price of an A: an educator’s responsibility to academic honesty. English Journal, 2001; 91(2):25-31. doi:10.11575/cpai.v3i2.71654.
  10. Wang X, & McClung SR. Toward a detailed understanding of illegal digital downloading intentions: an extended theory of planned behavior approach. New Media & Society. 2011; 13(4), 663-677. doi:10.1177/1461444810374225.
  11. Afedzie R, Onyina PA. Unethical information technology use in higher education: A review of literature in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Mâță L. (eds) Ethical Use of Information Technology in Higher Education. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Singapore.   doi:10.1007/978981-16-1951-9_2.
  12. Nejati M, Ismail S, Shafaei A. Students’ unethical behaviour: insights from an African country. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 2011;3(3-4), 276- 295. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2018149
  13. Ceyhan AA, Ceyhan E. Loneliness, depression and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic internet use. International Journal of Environmental Resources and Public Health, 2008; 11(6):699-701. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0255.
  14. Rahman MA, Sultana S. Software piracy in Bangladesh: The student perceptions study on two selected public universities in Dhaka City. Manarat International University Studies. 2015;4(1), 148-157. doi:10.1633/JISTap.2017.5.4.5.
  15. Chankova M, Teaching academic integrity: The Missing Link. Journal Academy of Ethics, 2020; 18, 155–173 doi:10.1007/s10805-019-09356-y.
  16. Kante M, Oboko R, Chepken C. An ICT model for increased adoption of farm input information in developing countries: A case in Sikasso. Mali. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019; 6(1), 26–46. doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2018.09.002.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 3 - Serial Number 54
September 2023
Pages 181-192

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics