Identifying the Criteria for Techno-Pedagogical Competencies of Faculty Members in Blended Learning Implementation: A Review

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Educational Technology in Medical Sciences, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: The paradigm shifts from traditional face-to-face instruction towards technology-enhanced learning modalities, such as e-learning and blended learning, necessitated a concurrent evolution in both pedagogical methodologies and the requisite competencies of learners and instructors. Given the burgeoning adoption of blended learning within the contemporary higher education landscape, it is imperative to rigorously identify and update the competencies of faculty members to ensure educational efficacy and alignment with current needs. This review study aimed to identify techno-pedagogical competencies among faculty members as critical factors in the effective implementation of blended learning.
Methods: A qualitative content analysis was conducted for this review. Using predefined keywords, 504 articles (reviews and original research) from various databases (such as ProQuest, Scopus, and so on) were retrieved within the time frame of 2010-2022. After applying inclusion criteria, 14 articles were analyzed using MAXQDA 2020 software until achieving thematic saturation, resulting in 185 initial codes and 26 components.
Results: The study identified five main categories and 26 components through merging previously identified condensed meaning units. These categories encompassed EdTech competency (9 codes), professional competency (4 codes), management and consulting competency (2 codes), digital teaching competency (7 codes), and communication and cooperation competencies (4 codes). 
Conclusion: The resulting conceptual framework can serve as a guideline for faculty development programs, empowering them to support them in integrating blended learning practices.

Highlights

Sahar Safyari (Google Scholar)

Eisa Rezaei (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References

1.    Wolff J. How is technology changing the world, and how should the world change technology? Global Perspectives. 2021 Jan 1;2(1). Doi:10.1525/gp.2021.27353.
2.    Cabaleiro-Cerviño G, Vera C. The impact of educational technologies in higher education. Gist: Education and Learning Research Journal. 2020 Jun 11;20:155–69. Doi:10.26817/16925777.711. 
3.    Karimian Z, Farrokhi MR, Moghadami M, Zarifsanaiey N, Mehrabi M, Khojasteh L, Salehi N. Medical education and COVID-19 pandemic: a crisis management model towards an evolutionary pathway. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(3):3299-3320. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10697-8. PubMed PMID: 34566468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8450917.
4.    Mansoori, S., Salari Koohfini, Z., Ghasemali, M. A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of E-learning and Blended Learning in Industrial Training. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 2020; 11(1): 46-53. Doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2020.84352.1006.
5.    Kazem BS, Rezaei E, Badali M, Ali D. The Impact of Using Blended Learning on Students’ Creativity. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science. 2014 Jul 23;4(1):113–27.
6.    Qasem AA, Viswanathappa G. Blended learning approach to develop the Teachers’ TPACK. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2016 Sep 1;7(3). Doi:10.30935/cedtech/6176.
7.    Dehghani, S., Sheikhi Fini, A. A., Zeinalipour, H., Rezaei, E. The Competencies Expected of Instructors in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 2020; 11(2): 69-83. Doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86482.1036.
8.    Archambault L, Barnett JH. Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education [Internet]. 2010 Dec 1;55(4):1656–62. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
9.    Graham CR, Burgoyne N, Cantrell P, Smith LM, Harris R. TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of in-service science teachers. TechTrends [Internet]. 2009 Aug 26;53(5):70–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
10.    Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record [Internet]. 2006 Jun 1;108(6):1017–54. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
11.    Alsofyani MM, Aris B, Eynon R. A preliminary evaluation of a short online training workshop for TPACK development. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2013 Jan 1;25(1):118–28.
12.    Swasti IK. Hybrid learning readiness: techno pedagogical skills and digital competence education. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings. 2023 May 20; Doi: 10.11594/nstp.2023.33105.
13.    Çam ŞS, Koç G. A needs analysis study on technological pedagogical content knowledge of faculty members. Education and Information Technologies. 2021 Apr 15;26(5):5337–63. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10540-0.
14.    Akram H, Yu Y, Al-Adwan AS, Alkhalifah A. Technology Integration in Higher Education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge model. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2021 Aug 26;12. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522.
15.    Houshmandi S, Rezaei E, Hatami J, Molaei B. E-learning readiness among faculty members of medical sciences universities and provide strategies to improve it. Research and Development in Medical Education. 2019 Dec 30;8(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2019.020.
16.    Clarke SO, Coates WC, Jordan J. A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 3 Using software for qualitative analysis. AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10644. Doi: 10.1002/aet2.10644. PMID: 34589659; PMCID: PMC8457694.
17.    DeCarlo M. 7.3 Unit of analysis and unit of observation [Internet]. Pressbooks. 2018. https://pressbooks.pub/scientificinquiryinsocialwork/chapter/7-3-unit-of-analysis-and-unit-of-observation.
18.    Wagner HR, Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Social Forces [Internet]. 1968 Jun 1;46(4):555. Doi: 10.2307/2575405
19.    Larisa S, Semeniako Y, Makhynia N, Baibakova O, Demianenko O. Pedagogical aspects of the development of teacher’s digital competence. Laplage Em Revista [Internet]. 2021 May 17;7(2):527–39. Doi: 10.24115/s2446-6220202172851p.527-539.
20.    Мезенцева ДА, Джавлах ЕС, Елисеева ОВ, Багаутдинова АШ. On the Question of Pedagogical Digital Competence. Vysšee Obrazovanie V Rossii [Internet]. 2020 Nov 28;29(11):88–97. Doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-88-97.
21.    Кубрушко ПФ, Alipichev AYu, Козленкова ЕН, Назарова ЛИ, Siman AS. Digital competence as the basis of a lecturer’s readiness for innovative pedagogical activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020 Nov 1;1691(1):012116. Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012116 .
22.    Grunis ML, Golovanova II, Kirilova GI, Levina EY, Sizova ZM. Transformation of Pedagogical Communicative Competence during Creation Digital Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2020 Dec 10;13(1):ep289. Doi: 10.30935/cedtech/9313.
23.    Asad MM, Aftab K, Sherwani F, Churi P, Moreno-Guerrero A-J, Pourshahian B. Techno-Pedagogical Skills for 21st Century Digital Classrooms: An extensive literature review. Education Research International. 2021 Dec 30;2021:1–12. Doi: 10.1155/2021/8160084.
24.    Heilporn G, Lakhal S, Bélisle M. An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2021 May 10;18(1). Doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3. 
25.    Pérez KVP, Torelló ÓM. Digital Competence as a cross-cutting axis of higher education teachers’ pedagogical competencies in the European higher education area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012 Jan 1;46:1112–6. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.257.
26.    McAnally-Salas L, Lavigne G, De Vega CA. Online course Instructional design from the professors’ pedagogic knowledge and technological skills. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. Volume 19; 2010:84-93.
27.    McPherson R, Noelting DT. Developing technical competence for the virtual classroom: managing technology-driven pedagogy, faculty development, and the hidden workload. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1;24(3):13–27. Doi: 10.18848/2327-0144/cgp/v24i03/13-27. 
28.    Barrera ÁPM, Hernández AAR, Luna JEO. ICT skills in university teachers, the knowledge, use, and pedagogical appropriation of these technologies. In: Communications in computer and information science [Internet]. 2018. p. 249–59. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95522-3_21. 
29.    Akram, Nimra Miss; Batool, Syeda Hina Dr; Hussain, Tauseef Mr; Safdar, Muhammad; and Hussain, Shahid Mr, Evolving visual arts’ faculty pedagogical skills through technology integration in higher education.Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal/( 4913). 2021. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4913.
30.    Masrur M. Digital leadership to improve the pedagogical competence of university English lecturers in Samarinda. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2021; 12(4): 424-446. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/3688.
31.    O’Doherty D, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, Dromey M, O’Tuathaigh C, et al. Internet skills of medical faculty and students: is there a difference? BMC Medical Education [Internet]. 2019 Jan 30;19(1). Doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1475-4. 
32.    Wilson FG, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for LawsHE’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development [Internet]. 2012 Jul 1;45(3):197–210. Doi: 10.1177/0748175612440286.
33.    Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563–75.
34.    Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research [Internet]. 1992 Nov 1;5(4):194–7. Doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80008-4.
35.    Wang AY. Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):9935-9952. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4. Epub 2022 Apr 7. PMID: 35411200; PMCID: PMC8987269.
36.    Jayatilleke A, Shah M. Examining the Technological Pedagogical Content Characteristics of Games for Medical Education. Med Sci Educ. 2020 Feb 11;30(1):529-536. Doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00891-2. PMID: 34457697; PMCID: PMC8368426.
37.    Gutiérrez RC, Del Valle De Moya Martínez M, Hernández-Bravo JA, Hernández-Bravo JR. Conocimiento y Uso de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) según el Estilo de Aprendizaje de los Futuros Maestros. Formación Universitaria. 2016 Jan 1;9(6):105–18. Doi:10.4067/s0718-50062016000600010.
38.    Figueredo ÓRB, Sarmiento JA. The challenge of training university professionals to integrate mobile learning. Educación Médica Superior. 2017 Mar 1;31(1):61–77. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=74922.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics