Online Graduate Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Social Work Faculty in Turkey

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Social Work, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

2 Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, USA

3 Department of Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey

4 School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, USA

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted all areas of life, and graduate education is no exception. Although prior research points to the effectiveness of delivering course content virtually, research on the effect of the unexpected and rapid nature of the transition from in-person to remote social work graduate education during the COVID-19 pandemic is limited. 
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted through an online open-ended survey in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using purposive sampling, 20 Social Work faculty members were selected from 8 universities in Turkey. An online research-made e-questionnaire with five main essay open-ended questions was used for data gathering. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. 
Results: In total, 20 social work faculty members aged 24 to 49 participated in this study. The faculty perspective on the students’ online experience during the pandemic highlighted challenges faced by students, such as technical issues, communication difficulties, decreased engagement, and limited participation in school work. Faculty also observed students struggling with mental health, family issues, and pandemic-related financial difficulties. Moreover, faculty noted limitations in their teaching methods, particularly the lack of interaction during lectures. However, faculty identified effective strategies for online teaching, including using a mix of asynchronous video lectures and live discussions, promoting independent student work, reducing course content, and modifying assignments. They also emphasized the benefits of minimizing reliance on traditional lectures and PowerPoint presentations, encouraging students to engage with and analyze information. 
Conclusion: Findings from this study point to the need for comprehensive institutional support to improve distance learning, including attending to students’ social-emotional learning and a focus on developing faculty skills at teaching in a virtual capacity and may improve how effectively social work programs deliver course content online. Both students and faculty prefer a hybrid approach combining in-person and online methods.

Highlights

Pinar Zubaroglu-Ioannides (Google Scholar)

Dana Alonzo (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References

  1. Hodges CB, Moore S, Lockee BB, Trust T, Bond MA. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. 2020. [Cited 2024 April]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104648.
  2. Anderson T. Towards a theory of online learning. Edmonton. AB: AU Press, Athabasca University; 2008.
  3. Lee D, Watson SL, Watson WR. Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian J Educ Tech. 2019;35(1):28-41. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3749.
  4. Li C, He J, Yuan C, Chen B, Sun Z. The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;1;82:51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004.
  5. Rovai AP, Downey JR. Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. Internet Higher Educ. 2010;1;13(3):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001.
  6. Cochran-Smith M, Keefe ES, Carney MC, Sánchez JG, Olivo M, Smith RJ. Teacher preparation at new graduate schools of education. Teacher Educ Quart. 2020;1;47(2):8-37. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001.
  7. East JF, LaMendola W, Alter C. Distance education and organizational environment. Journal of Soc Work Educ. 2014;2;50(1):19-33. doi: 10.1080/10437797.2014.856226.
  8. Afrouz R, Crisp BR. Online education in social work, effectiveness, benefits, and challenges: A scoping review. Australian Soc Work. 2021;2;74(1):55-67. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2020.1808030.
  9. Smoyer AB, O’Brien K, Rodriguez-Keyes E. Lessons learned from COVID-19: Being known in online social work classrooms. Int Soc Work. 2020;63(5):651-4. doi: 10.1177/0020872820940021.
  10. Forgey MA, Ortega-Williams A. Effectively teaching social work practice online: Moving beyond can to how. Adv Soc Work. 2016;25;17(1):59-77. doi: 10.18060/20877.
  11. Hitchcock LI, Sage M, Smyth NJ. Teaching Social Work with Digital Technology. Council on Social Work Education. 22314; 2019.
  12. Zubaroglu, Alonzo, Mashura, and Urhan. Social Work Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned for Programming and Practice. Int Sch Soc Work. 2021;12(1).
  13. Adnan M, Anwar K. Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives. Online Sub. 2020;2(1):4551. doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309.
  14. Albelbisi NA, Yusop FD. Factors influencing learners’ self–regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turk Online J Dis Educ. 2019;20(3):1-6. doi: 10.17718/tojde.598191.
  15. Ando S. University teaching and learning in a time of social distancing: A sociocultural perspective. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2021;19;31(1-4):435-48. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2020.1814928.
  16. Smoyer AB, O’Brien K, Rodriguez-Keyes E. Lessons learned from COVID-19: Being known in online social work classrooms. Int Soc Work. 2020;63(5):651-4. doi: 10.1177/0020872820940021.
  17. Okech D, Barner J, Segoshi M, Carney M. MSW student experiences in online vs. face-to-face teaching formats? Soc Work Educ. 2014;2;33(1):121-34. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2012.738661.
  18. Levin S, Fulginiti A, Moore B. The perceived effectiveness of online social work education: Insights from a national survey of social work educators. Soc Work Educ. 2018;18;37(6):775-89. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2018.1482864.
  19. IFSW. Global definition of social work; 2014 July. [Cited 2024 April]. Available from: https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work.
  20. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. PubMed PMID: 18352969.
  21. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. PubMed PMID: 16204405.
  22. Shek DT, Tang VM, Han XY. Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call. Res Soc Work Prac. 2005;15(3):180-94. doi: 10.1177/1049731504271603.
  23. Means B, Bakia M, Murphy R. Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge; 2014. doi: 10.4324/9780203095959
  24. Cummings SM, Chaffin KM, Cockerham C. Comparative analysis of an online and a traditional MSW program: Educational outcomes. J Soc Work Educ. 2015;2;51(1):109-20. doi: 10.1080/10437797.2015.977170.
  25. Forgey MA, Ortega-Williams A. Effectively teaching social work practice online: Moving beyond can to how. Adv Soc Work. 2016;25;17(1):59-77. doi: 10.18060/20877.
  26. Nguyen T. The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT J Online Learn Teach. 2015;1;11(2):309-19. https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Nguyen_0615.pdf.
  27. Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L, Wallet PA, Fiset M, Huang B. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Research. 2004;74(3):379-439. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003379.
  28. Pardasani M, Goldkind L, Heyman JC, Cross-Denny B. How much does the distance in distance education matter? Our students speak. Soc Work Educ. 2012;1;31(4):406-21. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2011.573547.
  29. Levin S, Fulginiti A, Moore B. The perceived effectiveness of online social work education: Insights from a national survey of social work educators. Soc Work Educ. 2018;18;37(6):775-89. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2018.1482864.
  30. Hodges CB, Fowler DJ. The COVID-19 Crisis and Faculty Members in Higher Education: From Emergency Remote Teaching to Better Teaching through Reflection. Int J Multidisciplinary Perspectives Higher Educ. 2020;5(1):118-22. EJ1273059. doi:10.32674/jimphe.v5i1.2507.
  31. Reamer FG. Distance and online social work education: Novel ethical challenges. J Teach Soc Work. 2013;1;33(4-5):369-84. doi: 10.1080/08841233.2013.828669.
  32. Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L, Wallet PA, Fiset M, Huang B. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(3):379-439. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003379.
  33. Twigg CA. Innovations in Online Learning: Moving beyond No Significant Difference. The Pew Symposia in Learning and Technology. 4th edition. Phoenix: Arizona; 2000.
  34. Tsai FH, Tsai CC, Lin KY. The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback types on game-based formative assessment in an online learning environment. Comp & Educ. 2015;1;81:259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.013.
  35. Jonassen D, Spector MJ, Driscoll M, Merrill MD, van Merrienboer J, Driscoll MP. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Routledge; 2008. https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Research-on-Educational-Communications-and-Technology-Third-Edition/Spector-Merrill-vanMerrienboer-Driscoll/p/book/9780415963381
  36. Boettcher JV, Conrad RM. The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and Practical Pedagogical Tips. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons; 2021. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Online+Teaching+Survival+Guide%3A+Simple+and+Practical+Pedagogical+Tips%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119765004.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 2
June 2024
Pages 126-142

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics