The Influence of Video-based Learning on Medical Students’ Second Language Pragmatic Knowledge and Motivation: An Educational Intervention

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: Learning English is crucial for students, particularly for developing a second language (L2). This investigation seeks to determine the influence of video-based learning on the pragmatic motivation of medical students. 
Methods: This study conducted an educational intervention using pre- and post-test procedures to compare the impact of two different English teaching methods, including video-based learning (intervention) and the routine method (standard pedagogical materials), on pragmatic development and general and specific pragmatic motivation. The study involved 54 medical students from Kerman University of Medical Sciences over an academic term from October 2021 to February 2022. Participants were selected using convenience sampling from two classes and then randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. A Discourse Completion Task (DCT), alongside the General Pragmatic Motivation Questionnaire (GPMQ) and Speech-Act-Specific Motivation Questionnaire (SASMQ), was used as the instrument for data gathering. Analysis was carried out using SPSS version 24, with statistical significance set at a P-value less than 0.05.
Results: Out of the 54 participants, 22 (40.74%) were male, and 32 (59.26%) were female, with a mean age of 21.5±1.5 years, ranging from 18 to 24 years. While no significant differences were noted in the groups’ pre-test scores (P>0.05), the post-test outcomes revealed significant improvements in the intervention group across three components: pragmatic development (P<0.001), general pragmatic motivation (P<0.001), and specific pragmatic motivation (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Merely teaching English in the classroom may not suffice to enhance language learners’ pragmatic competence. It seems that integrating videos and movies into language learning can enhance learners’ proficiency in using speech acts like requests and refusals. 

Highlights

Farahnaz Dayani (Google Scholar)

Valeh Jalali (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References

  1. Laughlin VT, Wain J, Schmidgall J. Defining and operationalizing the construct of pragmatic competence: Review and recommendations. ETS Research Report. 2015;(1):1-43. doi:10.1002/ets2.12053.
  2. Halenko N, Jones C. Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System. 2011;39(2):240-50. doi:1016/j.system.2011.05.003.
  3. Uso´-Juan E, Martínez-Flor A. Approaches to language learning and teaching: Towards acquiring communicative competence through the four skills. Education. 2006; 8(12):1-12. doi:1515/9783110197778.1.3.
  4. Li, S. The effects of input‐based practice on pragmatic development of requests in L2 Chinese. Language Learning. 2012;62(2):403-38. doi:1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00629.x.
  5. Martínez-Flor A. The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context. 2008;68(1):191-226. doi:5430/ijhe.v9n2p280.
  6. Yule, G. The Study of Language. 6th-ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
  7. Ziashahabi S, Jabbari AA, Razmi MH. The effect of interventionist instructions of English conversational implicatures on Iranian EFL intermediate level learners’ pragmatic competence development. Cogent Educ. 2020;7(1):1840008. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1840008.
  8. Rose KR. On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System. 2005;33(3):385-99. doi:1016/j.system.2005.06.003.
  9. Jeon EH, Kaya T. Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2006;p.165–211. doi: 10.1075/lllt.13.10jeo.
  10. Yoshimi D R. Explicit instruction and JFL learner's use of interactional discourse markers. In: K. R. Rose, G. Kasper (Eds.). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001; p. 223-244. doi:1017/CBO9781139524797.016.
  11. Abdullah Alsmari N. A video-driven approach to promoting pragmatic development in the context of English as a Foreign Language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue CALL. 2020;(6). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3675903.
  12. Schauer G A. Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2009.
  13. Roberts, Craige. New Work on Speech Acts. In: Daniel Fogal (ed.) et al. Speech Acts in Discourse Context. Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2018. P. 317–359. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0012.
  14. Alsuhaibani Z. Developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence: The case of compliment responses. Language Teaching Research. 2022;26(5):847-66. doi: 10.1177/1362168820913.
  15. Piniel K. L2 motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy: The interrelationship of individual variables in the secondary school context. Studies in second language learning and teaching. 2013;3(4):523-50. doi: 14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.5.
  16. Tajeddin Z, Moghadam AZ. Interlanguage pragmatic motivation: Its construct and impact on speech act production. RELC Journal. 2012;43(3):353-72. doi: 10.1177/0033688212468481.
  17. Li R, Raja R, Sazalie A. The relationship between motivation and pragmatic awareness: A case study of Chinese EFL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 2015;21(3):41-55. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/9067/1/9148-27890-1-PB.pdf.
  18. Hashemian M, Domakani M, Ansari M. The effect of movies on L2 learners' pragmatic competence: A case of request and apology. IJEI. 2016;3(1):2410-3446. http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/58/IJEI.Vol.3.No.9.01.pdf.
  19. Yang H, Ren W. Pragmatic awareness and second language learning motivation: a mixed-methods investigation. Pragmatics and Cognition. 2020;26(2):455–483. doi: 1075/pc.19022.yan.
  20. Yang H, Wu X. Language Learning Motivation and Its Role in Learner Complaint Production. Sustainability 2022;14,10770. doi: 10.3390/su141710770.
  21. Guan N, Song J, Li D. On the advantages of computer multimedia-aided English teaching. Procedia Computer Sci. 2018;131:727–32. doi: 1016/j.procs.2018.04.317.
  22. Abrams ZI. Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics. System. 2014;46(1):55-64. doi :1016/j.system.2014.06.005.
  23. Ryan J, Granville S. The suitability of film for modelling the pragmatics of interaction: Exploring authenticity. System. 2020;89(1):102186. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.102186.
  24. Taguchi N. Instructed pragmatics at a glance: where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching. 2015;48:1–50. doi: 10.1017/S0261444814000263.
  25. Karimian Z, Zare R, Zarifsanaiey N, Salehi N. The effect of video-based multimedia training on knowledge, attitude, and performance in breast self-examination. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):1-4. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01877-w.
  26. Rashid O F, Özge R. Impact of instruction based on movie and TV series clips on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence: Speech acts in focus. Frontiers in Psychology Journal. 2022;13:1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757.
  27. Birjandi P, Derakhshan A. Pragmatic comprehension of apology, request and refusal: an investigation on the effect of consciousness-raising video-driven prompts. AREL. English Lang. 2014;3(1): 67–86. doi: 22108/ARE.2014.15479.
  28. Rajabi S, Farahian M. The effects of pragmatic instruction on EFL learners’ awareness of suggestions. MJLTM. 2013;3(3):28.
  29. Polat M, Eristi B. The effects of authentic video materials on foreign language listening skill development and listening anxiety at different levels of English proficiency. IJCER. 2019;6(1):135-54. doi: 33200/ijcer.567863.
  30. Nunan D. Listening in a second language. In: Methodology in Language Teaching. The English Centre: University of Hong Kong; 2002. p. 238-241. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667190.032.
  31. Omar FR, Razı Ö. Impact of instruction based on movie and TV series clips on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence: Speech acts in focus. Front Psychol. 2022;13:974757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757.
  32. Ishihara N, Cohen A. Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. London: Routledge; 2014.
  33. Takahashi, S. The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose, and G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. 171-199.
  34. Li YA, Zhoumin YU. Pragmatic competence development: complaining speech act by Chinese Non-English-major graduates. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching. 2019;2(4).
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 2
June 2024
Pages 168-179

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics