Essential Competencies of Faculty Members in Virtual Education: A Post COVID-19 Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Business Management, Baft Higher Education Complex, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: The limitations of teachers' competencies in traditional settings, coupled with the evolving roles and responsibilities required for effective instruction in virtual education, underscore the significance of examining the specific competencies necessary for educators in this context. This study aimed to investigate the competencies that faculty members must possess for virtual education in the post-COVID-19 era and identify their priorities.
Methods: This research was designed in two distinct phases. The initial phase was carried out between June and November 2023. It involved a statistical sample of 225 faculty members from Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran, who were selected through a stratified sampling technique. The primary tool utilized for data collection was a standardized questionnaire comprising 31 items, designed on a Likert scale to assess various competencies. Validity (CVR=0.877; CVI=0.94) and reliability (α=0.88) were checked and confirmed, and SPSS V26 was used to analyze the data. In the second phase, the Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) was utilized alongside a questionnaire to evaluate and weigh the competencies. The statistical population for this segment comprised 12 academic experts, and data analysis was conducted using Excel software.
Results: The overall average score for all competencies exceeded the established criterion of 3.4, indicating that all 31 competencies are deemed essential. Among these, teaching skills emerged as the most significant, with a mean score of 4.68. The average importance ratings across the various competency categories were relatively similar (ethical-social: 4.29, technical-technological: 4.26, educational-learning: 4.29, individual-managerial: 4.28, supervisory-supportive: 4.27). The overall average for all competencies reached a significant level, recorded at 4.28. Utilizing the SWARA method for ranking, the competencies were prioritized as educational-learning, ethical-social, individual-managerial, technical-technological, and supervisory-supportive.
Conclusion: The competencies of faculty members, as the front line of education, are essential for effective virtual education. This research aimed to comprehend the current conditions and examine the significance of these competencies, ultimately concluding that they are indispensable.

Highlights

Amir Fazel (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References

  1. Hanneke T, Dave V. The didactic and pedagogical design of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. J Comput Assist Learn. 2022;38(1):18-29. doi: 10.1111 /jcal.12705.
  2. Arafah L, Susita D, Wolor C. Effect of e-learning training methods and instructor competencies on the effectiveness of training mediated by training motivation. TIJOSSW. 2022;4(1):204–215. doi: 5281/zenodo.6477511.
  3. Parhizgar MM, Fazel A, Harandi A. Readiness for Electronic Learning and Ranking of Related Factors Using the Fuzzy PROMETHEE: A Study at Kerman University of Medical Sciences. SDME. 2019;16(1):131–147. doi: 10.5812/sdme.84403.
  4. Al Wahhabi GH, Rajab BA. The impact of online learning on the female MA TESOL students’ academic performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Open J Mod Linguist. 2022;12(3):313-35. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2022.123024.
  5. Fernandez AA, Shaw GP. Academic Leadership in a Time of Crisis: The Coronavirus and COVID‐ Journal of Leadership Studies. 2020;14(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/jls.21684
  6. Mobaser Azad AM, Akhlaghi Nia A. Evaluation of the quality of the education management system of the Technical and Vocational University of Iran during the COVID-19 epidemic (Case Study of Shamsipour University, Tehran). Karafan Journal. 2021;17(Special Issue):167-87. doi: 10.48301/kssa.2021.128443.
  7. Abolmaali Alhosseini K. Psychological and Instructional consequences of Corona disease(COVID-19) and coping strategies with them. Educational Psychology. 2020;16(55):157-193. doi 22054/jep.2020.52371.2993.
  8. Haghani M, Bliemer MC, Goerlandt F, Li J. The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review. Saf Sci .2020;5(1):104-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104806. PubMed PMID: 32382213; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7203062.
  9. Börnert-Ringleb M, Casale G, Hillenbrand C. What predicts teachers’ use of digital learning in Germany? Examining the obstacles and conditions of digital learning in special education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2021;36(1):80–97. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2021.1872847.
  10. Mohammed A, Ahmed M, Mohammed F, Hamarai A. Using analysis of variance in the academic achievement to compare three learning patterns for university students. Creat Educ. 2022;13(6):2104-18. doi: 10.4236/ce.2022.136131.
  11. Esmaeili Shad B. Analyzing the lived experiences of teachers during the Corona era and providing a practical model for implementing the evaluation process in post-COVID-19 combined education. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2022;13(1):1-21. Available from: https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/psyedu/Article/953155. [In Persian]
  12. Abasi F, Hejazi E. Hakimzadeh, R. Lived experience of elementary school teachers of teaching opportunities and challenges in the educational network Students (Shad): a phenomenological study. Journal of Research in Teaching. 2020;8(3):15-30. Available from: https://trj.uok.ac.ir/article_61636_en.html. [In Persian]
  13. Tabatabai S. COVID-19 impact and virtual medical education. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(3):140-43. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86070.1213. PubMed PMID: 32802908; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7395196.
  14. Hasan N, Bao Y. Impact of e-Learning crack-up perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of fear of academic year loss. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;118:105355. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355. PubMed PMID: 32834276; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7422835.
  15. Abedi H, Ahmadabadi A, Ghorooneh D. Identify professional needs associated with the teaching of faculty members and teachers at the Farhangian University.  2017;1(3):9-43. dor: 20.1001.1.26457725.1396.1.3.1.2. [In Persian]
  16. Moradi Sarvestani A, Zarei R. Needs assessment of in-service trainin courses for education staff in District 4 of Shiraz. Journal of New Approach in Training Management. 2017; 8(29):283-96. dor: 20.1001.1.20086369.1396.8.29.14.8. [In Persian]
  17. Mehraliyan A, Maghami H. Competencies required by the desired electronic teacher in the educational system. Cognitive strategies in learning. 2022;10(19):259-84. doi: 10.22084/j.psychogy.2022.26053.2455.
  18. Aslami M, Ojaghi Identifying the competency components of instructors in e-learning environment based on a constructivist approach. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2022;28(4):143-69. doi: 10.22034/irphe.2022.705233. [In Persian]
  19. Riemann T, Metternich J. Virtual reality supported trainings for lean education: conceptualization, design and evaluation of competency-oriented teaching-learning environments. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2023;14(6):1102-20.  doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2022-0095.
  20. Habibi A, Mukminin A, Yaqin LN, Parhanuddin L, Razak RA, Nazry NM, Fathurrijal F. Mapping instructional barriers during COVID-19 outbreak: Islamic education context. Religions. 2021;12(1):50-70. doi: 10.3390/rel12010050.
  21. Singleton R, Ruiz Cosignani D, Kam M, Clune M, Charlton A, Jowsey T. Faculty development for strengthening online teaching capability: a mixed-methods study of what staff want, evaluated with Kirkpatrick's model of teaching effectiveness. 2023;(13):127. doi: 10.12688/mep.19692.2. PubMed PMID: 38144874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10739185.
  22. Azimi HM. Readiness for implementation of e-learning in colleges of education and assessment of e-learning needs among its faculty members and students. J Nov Appl Sci. 2013;2(12):769-75. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/32036.
  23. Simone Christina D. Preparing our teachers for distance education, College- Teaching. 2006;54(1):183-184. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.183-184.
  24. Levinsen K. Collaborative Online teaching: The Inevitable Path to Deep Learning and Knowledge Sharing. EJEL. 2006;4(1):41-48. Available from: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1484.
  25. Gilzene-Cheese F, Fleming-Banks P, Drakes C, Gilzene S. Rules of Engagement: Improving Teaching through Online Faculty Development Training. Regional Conference on Institutionalising Best Practice in Higher Education; 2015 June 24-26; The University of the West Indies, Jamaica. Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, UWI; Quality Assurance Unit, UWI. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2139/40114.
  26. Amundsen C, Wilson M. Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Rev Educ Res. 2012;82(1),90-126. doi: 10.3102/0034654312438409.
  27. Hajizadeh A, Azizi G, Keyhan G. Analyzing the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in the Corona era: An approach to the development of e-learning in the post-COVID-19. Research in Teaching. 2021;9(1):204-174. dor: 20.1001.1.24765686.1400.9.1.9.1. [In Persian]
  28. Sadeghpour B, Mirzaei S. Faculty Members’ attitudinal challenges to e-learning.  TEJ. 2008;2(4):277-87. doi: 10.22061/tej.2008.1309. [In Persian]
  29. Daneshvar M, Mehrmohammadi M. The required qualities of e-learning instructors. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2013;4(3):10-19. Available from: https://ijvlms.sums.ac.ir/article_46079.html.
  30. Pourjamshidi M, Fardanesh H, Norouzi D. Effective factors on student-teacher interaction in web-based learning environment. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2014;7(1):41-50. Available from: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-491.
  31. Elzainy A, Sadik AE, Abdulmonem A. Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020;15(6):456-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.09.005. PubMed PMID: 33106752; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7578775.
  32. Keršuliene V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). Journal of business economics and management. 2010;11(2):243-58. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
  33. Louangrath PI, Sutanapong C. Validity and reliability of survey scales. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2018;4(3):99-114.‏ doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2545038.
  34. Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm. 2018.03.066. PubMed PMID: 29606610.
  35. Maghsoudi M, Safaee F, Hashemi A. The Quality of Virtual Learning at Farhangian Teacher Education University of Markazi Province during the Corona Epidemic from the trainees and trainers' perspectives. TEJ. 2022;16(3):525-538. doi: 10.22061/tej.2022.8221.2639.
  36. Dortaj F, Rajabiyan DM, Allahkarami A. The role of media literacy in predicting attitudes toward e-learning of students and professors in the Corona. Journal of Research in Educational Systems. 2022;15(55):85-97. dor: 1001.1.23831324.1400.15.55.7.5. [In Persian]
  37. Swartz S, Barbosa B, Crawford I. Building intercultural competence through virtual team collaboration across global classrooms. BPCQ. 2019;83(1):1-23. doi: 10.1177/2329490619878834.
  38. Fazel A, Harandi A. Identifying and explaining the skills of academic staff members for virtual education in post-COVID-19: Providing a conceptual model. TEJ. 2023;18(1): 249-70. doi: 10.22061/tej.2024.10249.2975.
  39. Narenji F, Mostafavi Z, Ebadi R, Uzbashe A. Identifying of learning needs of faculty members in online higher education. Educational and Scholastic studies. 2014;3(3):29-53. Available from: https://pma.cfu.ac.ir/article_491.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
  40. Egielewa P, Idogho P, Iyalomhe F, Cirella G. COVID-19 and digitized education: analysis of online learning in Nigerian higher education. E-learning and Digital Media. 2022;19(1):19-35. doi: 10.1177/20427530211022808.
  41. Karimi F, Hosseini M, Malekpour A, Moezzi M, Hosseini A, Raisi N. Needs assessment of faculty members' educational needs in order to empower them at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. DSME. 2019;6(1):47-59. doi:10.29252/dsme.6.1.47.
  42. Grenon V, Lafleur F, Samson G. Developing the Techno-pedagogical Skills of Online University Instructors. IJEDE. 2019;34(2):69-78. Available from: https:// www.ijede.ca/ index. Php /jde/article/ view/1111.
  43. De la Rama J, Sabasales M, Antonio A, Ricohermoso C, Torres J, Devanadera A, Alieto E. Virtual teaching as the'new norm’: analyzing science teachers’ attitude toward online teaching, technological competence and access. IJAST. 2020;(10)1:32-45. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3654236.
  44. Toulabi T, Sheikhian A, Galehdar N, Anbari K, Mohammadi E, Majidimehr M. Educational needs of faculty members of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences by Delphi Technique. JNE. 2015;4(2):28-37. Available from: http://jne.ir/article-1-483-fa.html. [In Persian]
  45. Bashir A, Bashir S, Rana K, Lambert P, Vernallis A. Post COVID-19 adaptations; the shifts towards online learning, hybrid course delivery and the implications for biosciences courses in the higher education setting. Front Educ. 2021;6:71-85.  doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.711619.
  46. Ruzanna T, Jie Zh. Validation of virtual learning team competencies for individual students in a distance education setting. Am J Distance Educ. 2014;28(4):264-279.  doi: 1080/08923647.2014.958909.
  47. Johnson CC, Walton JB, Strickler L, Elliott JB. Online teaching in k-12 education in the United States: a systematic review. RER. 2023;93(3):353-411. doi: 10.3102/00346543221105550.
  48. Sofi-Karim M, Bali AO, Rached K. Online education via media platforms and applications as an innovative teaching method. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28:507–523. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11188-0. PubMed PMID: 35791317; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9247945.
  49. Dos Santos LM. Online learning after the COVID-19 pandemic: Learners’ motivations. Front. Educ. 2022;7(1):87-101. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.879091.
  50. Jandigulov A, Abdallah AK, Tikhonova Y. Management and leadership in online learning. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;13(1):423–37. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11699-4.
  51. Moorhouse BL, Li Y, Walsh S. E-Classroom interactional competencies: mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal. 2023;54(1):114-28. doi:10.1177/0033688220985274.
  52. Moosavi S, Gholamnejad H, Hassan Shiri F, Raoufi SH. Challenges of virtual education during the pandemic of COVID-19: A qualitative research. IJN. 2022;35(135):94-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/993043/en.
  53. Garakani N, Dehghani M. Identifying the dimensions and components of effective teaching in emergency virtual education from elementary school teachers' perspective during COVID-19 pandemic. TLR. 2022;18(2): 157-180. doi: 10.22070/tlr.2023.15864.1229. [In Persian]
  54. Hamidian Divkolaei L, Bagheri SM. Evaluating the effect of different learning styles on the performance of architecture students in virtual training.  TEJ. 2023;17(3):507-24. doi: 10.22061/tej.2023.9440.2847. [In Persian]
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 58
September 2024
Pages 256-272

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics