Article Types / Review Article

Review Articles provide a summary, analysis, and comparison of the existing literature in a specific field. They debate the current state and progress in a particular area and may provide recommendations for future research. They are often written by leading authorities in a certain discipline and highlight recent trends, problems, and gaps in that discipline. The information below details the section headings that must be included in a review article. However, it is strongly recommended to follow the comprehensive guidelines provided by PRISMA 2020 checklist for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, the PRISMA-ScR checklist for Scoping Reviews, and the SANRA checklist for Narrative and Literature Reviews.


The IJVLMS generally accepts review articles of 4000-6000 words (including references), 6 Tables/Figures, and at least 40 references.


  • Abstract (structured with the following sections and 250-300 words)
    1. Background
    2. Methods
    3. Results
    4. Conclusion

Keywords (4-7 keywords based on the MeSH Browser) should be provided for indexing purposes and online searches. Authors are encouraged to browse through articles on similar topics to find appropriate keywords.


  • Introduction: In this section, the authors explain the issues/questions being addressed and their significance in relevant research areas.
  • Methods: This section specifies the data sources and explains the data acquisition and search process in detail. This process includes search strategies, timing of the study (and other search limits), study selection, and data collection methods. Other methods of data acquisition, such as the subsequent reference searches of retrieved articles, should be indicated as well. The applied methods for quality assessment and the inclusion of identified articles will also be explained. To better organize their manuscripts (especially the subheadings of the Methods section) authors are encouraged to consult the Checklists for different study types.
  • Results: This section provides the number of screened studies, their characteristics, selection procedures, and an assessment of the risk of bias. The results of the individual studies are synthesized, and the major findings are explained. These findings are presented as the evidence-based and objective results of the of the review article.
  • Discussion:  Here the major findings are analyzed and developed to address the target questions of the research. The findings in other studies are either mentioned as support and evidence, or as a backdrop to compare the new findings. Finally, a general interpretation of the results, their contribution to other studies, and their implications for future research are discussed.
  • Limitations and Suggestions: The limitations of the study and the implications of the findings for future research or clinical practice should be explored.
  • Conclusion: should state the final result and recommendation that the author(s) has (have) reached. Such results and recommendations should be derived from the researcher’s own study and the results of other studies should not be stated in this section.

Footnotes

 

  • Abbreviations: In articles where abbreviations are frequently used, it is better to provide an abbreviation list for readers to reference and understand the concepts more quickly.

  • Acknowledgments: Recognize the individuals, institutes, or organizations that have contributed to the preparation of the article but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Contributions may include academic, technical, financial, or personal assistance in preparing the articles. The authors must indicate the contributors' affiliations and their specific contributions. The use of AI for writing assistance should be reported in the acknowledgment section.

  • Authors’ Contribution: Authors specify their contributions to the research process and writing of the manuscript. They indicate their contributions to different aspects of a project such as conceptualization, study design, experimentation, data acquisition, statistical analysis, preparing the manuscript, etc. Please note that the authors’ initials, rather than full names, should be used for identification.
  • Conflict of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial and non-financial competing interests in advance of the review process. They need to declare if they received financial payment for the research, or if they have close relationships with people or entities that could inappropriately influence (bias) their study. Non-financial interests may include the disclosure of any personal, political, religious, ideological, academic, and intellectual interests that might bias a study. General institutional support for an author’s time on the work should be distinguished from direct overall funding of the work. An appropriate funding statement might be: “The study was funded by A; Dr. F’s time on the work was supported by B.” If there are no competing interests, add the following statement: “The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper”.
  • Funding/Support: All sources of financial and material support for the research work are acknowledged in this section. Authors should identify the roles of the sponsor(s) if any, in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in preparing the manuscript. Please include the name(s) of the funding organization(s) along with the grant number(s). If no funding has been provided for the research, please add the following statement: "This research did not receive any outside funding or support".
  • Availability of Data and Materials: A Data Availability Statement should be included in all of the review articles. Your data availability statement should describe how the data supporting the results reported in your paper can be accessed. With a data statement, an author can provide information about the data presented in an article and provide a reason if data is not available to access. Click HERE to see a template for different kinds of statements.

  • References conform to the style outlined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), also referred to as the “Vancouver” style. References in the text should be numbered sequentially and placed in parentheses. 

The following general instructions must be observed when citing references. Moreover, IJVLMS has its own EndNote style. Authors are advised to prepare their references based on this style and add the file to the style folder of their Endnote in program files. This style is available HERE.

  • Referencing AI-generated material as the primary source is not acceptable.
  • References should be made to published articles rather than to abstracts whenever possible.

In-text citation:

  • References in the text should be numbered sequentially and placed in parentheses.
  • For in-text citation of a work with more than one author, use ‘et al.’ after the first author.
  • When citing several references for the same statement, use a hyphen to link the first and last numbers that are inclusive. For instance, (4, 5, 6, 7) must be abbreviated to (4-7). Use commas where the numbers are not consecutive in a multiple citation, e.g. (8, 13).

 Reference List:

  • The reference list appears at the end of the paper and is titled ‘References’.
  • References are listed in numerical order, and in the same order, they are cited in the text.
  • The reference list should include all and only those references that appear in the text.
  • If a work has more than 6 authors, please list the first six authors, followed by ‘et al.’
  • The number of references from theses, conference papers, and websites should not exceed 5 percent of the total references.
  • Please note that the journal titles in the reference list should be abbreviated in the style used in the NLM Catalog.
  • At least 80% of the references must have article identifiers, such as digital object identifier (DOI) and PubMed PMID (or PubMed Central PMCID). Please add these identifiers at the end of your references when available. You can visit the following link to search for DOIs and PMIDs of articles: http://www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery. EndNote software is highly recommended for writing and managing references.

Listed below are sample references for different types of work. For further details and examples, authors may consult Citing Medicine: The NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers (2nd edition).

 

Journal Article:

Almarzooq ZI, Lopes M, Kochar A. Virtual Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Disruptive Technology in Graduate Medical Education. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(20):2635-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.015. PubMed PMID: 32304797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7159871.

Complete Book:

Secker J. Electronic Resources in the Virtual Learning Environment: A Guide for Librarians. Edition (if not first) - ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2004.

Chapter in an Edited Book:

Fournier H, Kop R, Molyneaux H. New personal learning ecosystems: a decade of research in review. In: Becnel K, editor. Emerging technologies in virtual learning environments. Harshey: IGI Global; 2019. p. 1-19.

Thesis:

Kaplan SJ. Postgraduate students’ professionalism [dissertation]. St. Louis (MO): Washington University; 2021. (DOI is required)

Conference Paper:

Kimura J, Shibasaki H, editors. Recent advances in clinical neurophysiology. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of EMG and Clinical Neurophysiology; 1995 Oct 15‐19; Kyoto, Japan. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier; 1996. (DOI is required)

Website: 

Meyer D. Virtual learning is the way forward for educators. Elmhurst: Elmhurst University; 2020 Oct 8. [Cited 2021 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.elmhurst.edu/blog/virtual-learning/.