Team-based and Collaborative Learning Studies in Flipped Classrooms: A Scoping Review in Higher Education

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: Flipped or reverse class model is a new educational method which created a great revolution in education, significantly higher education, based on new technologies.The flipped class is based on the reliable theoretical foundations and represents a unique combination of learning theories. Team-based and collaborative
learning is very inclusive and uses peer evaluation and immediate feedback to ensure individual and team responsibility to promote the learning outcomes. This study aims to provide a scoping of research studies conducted connected to flipped classroom based on team-based and collaborative learning.
Methods: This study used a scoping review method to identify, evaluate, and analyze studies on flipped classrooms based on team-based and participatory learning. The study population is the articles related to flipped classroom, team-based learning, and participative learning in higher education from 2012 to 2022. The articles in this review were selected with criteria including articles with features such as Persian or English publishing language. Then, by quantitative or qualitative approaches, done during the last 10 years. Furthermore, the keywords were flipped classroom, collaborative learning, team learning, team-based learning, and higher education.
Results: The findings show a positive effect of flipped classrooms on team-based and participative learning. The flipped classroom positively affects peer interaction with teachers, enhances collaboration, strengthens team building, and enhances teamwork.
Conclusion: When using a participatory strategy in a flipped classroom, team building, and teamwork strategies could be considered if we look for significant motivational achievements for students. Educators should consider combining the participatory process with active learning methods such as the flipped classroom approach when using the participatory process

Keywords

References

Chen T, Peng L, Yin X, Rong J, Yang J, Cong G. Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Healthcare. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2020. p. 200. doi:10.3390/healthcare8030200.
Bognar B, Sablić M, Škugor A. Flipped learning and online discussion in higher education teaching. In: Didactics of smart pedagogy. Springer, Cham, 2019; 371-392. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_19.
Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Medical teacher, 2012; 34.5: e275-e287. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179.
Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for technology in education, 2012. 5 Kavanagh L, Reidsema C, McCredden J, Smith N. Design considerations. In: The flipped classroom. Springer, Singapore, 2017. p. 15-35. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_2.
Evseeva A, Solozhenko A. Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 206: 205-209. doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.10.006.
Ölmefors O, Scheffel J. High school student perspectives on flipped classroom learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 2021, 1-18. doi:10.1080/14681366.2021.1 948444. 
Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher education research & development, 2015, 34.1: 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.20 14.934336.
Clark KR. The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators online, 2015, 12(1): 91-115.
Lemmer CA. A view from the flip side: Using the inverted classroom to enhance the legal information literacy of the international LL. M. student. Law Libr. J., 2013, 105: 461.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 2004, 93.3: 223-231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004. tb00809.x.
Nishigawa K, Omoto K, Hayama R, Okura K, Tajima T, Suzuki Y, Hosoki M, Shigemoto S, Ueda M, Rodis OM, Matsuka Y. Comparison between flipped classroom and team-based learning in fixed prosthodontic education. Journal of prosthodontic research, 2017, 61.2: 217- 222. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.003.
Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. 2004.
Haidet P, Levine RE, Parmelee DX, Crow S, Kennedy F, Kelly PA, Perkowski L, Michaelsen L, Richards BF. Perspective: guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature. Academic medicine, 2012, 87.3: 292-299. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318244759e.
Inuwa IM, Al-Rawahy M, Roychoudhry S, Taranikanti V. Implementing a modified team-based learning strategy in the first phase of an outcome-based curriculum–Challenges and prospects. Medical teacher, 2012, 34.7: e492-e499. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.668633.
Michaelsen LK, Sweet M. The essential elements of team‐based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008, 2008.116: 7-27. doi:10.1002/tl.330.
Tanner KD. Structure matters: Twentyone teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 2013, 12.3: 322-331. doi:10.1187/ cbe.13-06-0115.
Sablan B, Hidayanto AN. Flipped learning effect on classroom engagement and outcomes in university information systems class. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, 27.3: 3341-3359. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10723-9. 
Şengel E. To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 64: 547-555. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2016.07.034.
Tondeur J, Van Braak J, Sang G, Voogt J, Fisser P, Ottenbreit-Leftwich A. Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 2012; 59(1), 134-144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.
Hammersley M. On systematic reviews of research literatures: a narrative response to Hammersley M. On systematic reviews of research literatures: a narrative response to Evans & Bene field. British educational research journal, 2001; 27(5), 543-554. doi:10.1080/01411920120095726.
Dong Y, Yin H, Du S, Wang A. The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasiexperimental design. Nurse Education Today, 2021, 105: 105037. doi:10.1016/j. nedt.2021.105037.
Park HR, Park E. Nursing students’ perception of class immersion facilitators in psychiatric nursing: Team-based learning combined with flipped learning. Nurse Education Today, 2021, 98: 104653. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104653. 
Chiang FK, Wu Z. Flipping a classroom with a three-stage collaborative instructional model (3-CI) for graduate students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2021, 37.4: 51-67. doi:10.14742/ajet.6330.
Kayaduman H. Student interactions in a flipped classroom‐based undergraduate engineering statistics course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2021, 29.4: 969-978. doi:10.1002/cae.22239.
Hsia LH, Lin YN, Hwang GJ. A creative problem solving‐based flipped learning strategy for promoting students’ performing creativity, skills and tendencies of creative thinking and collaboration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2021, 52.4: 1771- 1787. doi:10.1111/bjet.13073.
Lai HM. Understanding what determines university students’ behavioral engagement in a group-based flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 2021; 173: 104290. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2021.104290.
Nishigawa K, Omoto K, Hayama R, Okura K, Tajima T, Suzuki Y, Hosoki M, Shigemoto S, Ueda M, Rodis OM, Matsuka Y. Comparison between flipped classroom and team-based learning in fixed prosthodontic education. Journal of prosthodontic research, 2017, 61.2: 217- 222. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.003.
Huang CK, Lin CY. Flipping business education: Transformative use of teambased learning in human resource management classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2017; 20(1): 323-336.
Zheng X, Johnson TE, Zhou C. A pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2020; 3527–3545. doi:10.1007/ s11423-020-09868-0.
Chen MR, Hwang GJ, Chang YY. A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2019, 50.5: 2288- 2307. doi:10.1111/bjet.12823.
Colon AO, Galiano IM, Colmenero-Ruiz M. Impact of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning in childhood teaching university degree. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2017; 13.3.
Fox WH, Docherty PD. Student perspectives of independent and collaborative learning in a flipped foundational engineering course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2019; 35(5): 79-94. doi:10.14742/ajet.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
Volume 13, Issue 3 - Serial Number 50
September 2022
Pages 149-164

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics