Online Peer Assessment on Student Learning Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

Department of Education, Bushehr Province, Bushehr, Iran

Abstract

Background: In recent years, “peer assessment” has been one of the most important educational strategies that researchers and teachers have used to improve the students’ writing skills, motivation, and learning in various fields. This review study was conducted with the aim of online peer assessment on the students’ learning outcomes. Methods: In this narrative review research, through keywords related to online peer assessment on the outcome of students’ learning, the studies conducted in Persian or English languages and written in full text from 2013 to 2023 were searched in reliable scientific databases such as Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SID, and Magiran. The studies that were not in line with the purpose of the research or were published in the form of a letter to the editor were excluded from the study. From the 44 searched articles, 12 were related to online peer evaluation on the students’ learning outcomes and selected. Results: Evaluation in online environments can be more important than that in traditional classrooms. The use of peer assessment in online learning environments has many advantages, including increasing the timeliness of feedback, providing learning opportunities for the provider and receiver of the feedback, humanizing this environment, and building community. By involving students in the peer evaluation process, meaningful interaction with peers and with the content of the discussed writings increases, which in turn increases the students’ and instructors’ satisfaction with the course. If peer evaluation is used effectively, it has the potential to increase the quality of discourse/discussion and, as a result, the quality of learning in the online environment. Conclusion: Online assessment by peers is effective on the students’ learning outcomes. However, more studies are recommended to be conducted to determine different aspects and challenges of this intervention.

Keywords

References

Gawlik-Kobylińska M, Maciejewski P, editors. New technologies in education for security and safety. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology; 2019.
Noroozi  O,  Biemans  H,  Mulder  M. Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education. 2016;31:20-31.
Valero Haro A, Noroozi O, Biemans HJ, Mulder M. The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain- specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education. 2019;53(4):390-8.
Noroozi  O,  Mulder  M.  Design  and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal  change,  and  satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology E ducat ion. 2017;45(1):31-9.
Hsia L-H, Huang I, Hwang G-J. Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students’ performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education. 2 016;9 6:55 -71.
Gielen M, De Wever B. Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment i n a wi k i envi ron ment: I mpact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers & Education. 2015;88:370 -86.
Sa h i n S. A n appl icat ion of pee r a sse ssme nt  in higher education. Turkish Online Journal  of  Educational Technology- TOJET. 2008;7(2):5-10.
Ashenafi  MM.  Peer-assessment  in higher education–twenty-first century pract ices, challenges a nd the way for wa rd. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher E ducat ion. 2017;42(2):226 -51.
Seifer t T, Feli k s O. O n li ne self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’  assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019;44(2):169-85.
Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta- analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational research. 2000;70(3):287-322.
Van der Kleij FM, Feskens RC, Eggen TJ. Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research. 2015;85(4):475-511.
Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J, van Dalen J, Platt FW. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine: CRC press; 2017.
Latifi S, Noroozi O, Talaee E. Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;52(2):768-84.
Noroozi O, Hatami J, Latifi S, Fardanesh H. The effects of argumentation training in online peer feedback environment on process and outcomes of lea r n i ng. Jou r nal of Educat ional Sci nces. 2019;26(2):71-88.
Latifi S, Noroozi O, Hatami J, Biemans HJ. How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2021;58(2):195-206.
Hoffman  B.  The  influence  of  peer assessment training on assessment knowledge and reflective writing skill. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2019.
Double KS, McGrane JA, Hopfenbeck TN. The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review. 2020;32(2):481-509.
Noroozi O, Hatami J. The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2018.
Huisman B, Saab N, van den Broek P, van Dr iel J. T he i mpact of for mat ive peer feedback on higher education students’ academic  writing:  a  Meta-Analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019;44(6):863-80.
Amendola  D,  Miceli  C.  ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’LEARNING OUTCOMES AND SOFT SKILLS. Italian Journal of Educat ional Tech nolog y. 2018;26(3):71-84.
Liu J, Guo X, Gao R, Fram P, Ling Y, Zhang H, et al. Students’ learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019;44(6):835-47.
Crowe JA, Silva T, Ceresola R. The effect of peer review on student learning outcomes in a research methods course. Teaching Sociology. 2015;43(3):201-13.
Liu EZ-F, Lee C-Y. Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment.  Turkish  Online  Journal of Educational  Technology-TOJET. 2013;12(1):187-99.
Balaji  M,  Chakrabarti  D.  Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from’media richness theory’perspective. Journal of interactive online learning. 2010;9(1).
Bouhami W. Investigating the impact of social media on i mprovi ng EFL st udents’ vocabulary.  Unpublished  Master’s Dissertation)  Mohammed  Kheider Un iversit y of Bisk ra, People’s Democrat ic Republic of Algeria. 2016.
Khan IU, Ayaz M, Faheem M. The role of social media in development of English language vocabulary at university level. International Journal of Academic Resea rch i n Busi ness a nd Social Sciences. 2016;6(12):590 - 60 4.
Khansarian-Dehkordi F, Ameri-Golestan A. Ef fects of social net work i ng on I ran ian EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition. Resea rch i n English Lang uage Ped agogy. 2 017; 5 (2): 9 7-111.
Dehghan F, Rezvani R, Fazeli S. Social networks and their effectiveness in learning foreign language vocabulary: A comparative study using WhatsApp. cal l- ej. 2017;18(2):1-13.
Pe t e r  L ,  Rei nd l  R ,  Z a ut e r  S ,  H i l le m a che r  T,  R i c h t e r  K .  E f f e c t i v e n e s s  of  a n  o n l i n e  C B T- I  intervention and a face-to-face treatment for sh if t work sleep d isorder: a compa r ison of sleep diary data. International journal of environmental research and public he alt h. 2019;16(17):3081.
Ma Q. Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2020;33(3):197-216.
Tia n L , Z hou Y. Lea r ner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback i n a n on li ne EFL w r it i ng context. System. 2020;91:102247.
Zong Z, Schunn CD, Wang Y. What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students’ task performance?  Computers  in  Human Behavior. 2021;124:106924.
Li L, Peng Z, Lu L, Liao H, Li H. Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;118:105358.
Dooley LM, Bamford NJ. Peer feedback on collaborative learning activities in veter i na r y educat ion. Veter i na r y Sciences. 2018;5(4):90.
Wentzel  KR.  Implications  for  the development of positive student identities and motivation at school. Self-concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success  with  research  and  practice. 2 015: 29 9 -337.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics