Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

The Digital Dilemma: Extramarital Relationships in Social Networks and the Mediating Role of Spirituality and Religious Attitudes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Akram Malekzadeh
Khatoon Pourmaveddat
Elahe Aslami
Maryamosadat Mirmotahar
Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
10.30476/ijvlms.2025.102858.1306
Abstract
Background: The family unit is recognized as one of the five essential social structures. Extramarital relationships pose a significant threat to this structure, leading to numerous issues and are regarded as a primary contributor to divorce. The rising incidence of extramarital relationships has led researchers to examine the underlying dynamics and contributing factors. This study aimed to explore the influence of social networks on extramarital relationships, with a particular focus on the mediating effects of spirituality and religious beliefs.
Methods: This study employed a descriptive-correlational design with a structural equation modeling approach. The statistical population included all married individuals aged 25 to 55 living in Tehran, Iran, who sought counseling services in two regions of Tehran during 2023 due to issues related to extramarital affairs. Using convenience sampling, a sample of 230 participants was selected based on the number of model components. Data were collected using the Attitude Toward Infidelity Scale (Whatley, 2006), the Religious Attitude Questionnaire (Glock and Stark, 1965), the Spiritual Assessment Inventory (Hall and Edwards, 1996), and Jahanbani’s Social Networks Questionnaire (2018). Statistical analyses included Pearson’s correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling, performed using SPSS version 26 and Amos version 24. 
Results: Data from 230 participants, comprising 118 women (51.30%) and 112 men (48.69%) with a mean age of 38.55 years, were analyzed. Results from the structural equation modeling indicated a significant positive correlation between social network usage and extramarital relationships (t=3.29, r=0.74). Additionally, religious attitudes showed a significant negative correlation with extramarital relationships (t=1.39, r=-0.32), while spirituality was significantly positively correlated with extramarital relationships (t=1.20, r=0.49). Furthermore, both spirituality and religious attitudes served as mediators in the relationship between virtual space usage and marital relationships (t=2.29, r=0.41; t=1.98, r=0.31).
Conclusion: Given the inability to eliminate virtual environments and their influence on marital relationships, enhancing spirituality and religiosity may serve as an effective measure to prevent infidelity.

Highlights

Akram Malekzadeh (Google Scholar)

Khatoon Pourmaveddat (Google Scholar)

Keywords
Extramarital Affair
Spirituality
Religious Attitudes
Social Networking
Internet
  1. Ellison NB, Boyd DM. Sociality through Social Network Sites. UK: Oxford University Press eBooks; 2013. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008.
  2. Li X, Cao H, Lan J, Ju X, Zheng Y, Chen Y, Zhou N, Fang X. The association between transition pattern of marital conflict resolution styles and marital quality trajectory during the early years of Chinese marriage. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2019; 36(1):153-86. doi: 10.1177/0265407517721380.
  3. Sevinc M, Garip ES. A study of Parents’ Child-raising Styles and Marital Harmony. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;1(2):1648-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.252.
  4. McNeill T. Family as a social determinant of health: implications for governments and institutions to promote the health and well-being of families. Healthc Q. 2010;14 Spec No 1:60-7. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2010.21984. PubMed PMID: 20959748.
  5. Hertlein KM, Wetchler JL, Piercy FP. Infidelity: An Overview. Handbook of the clinical treatment of infidelity. London: Routledge; 2013. P. 5-16.
  6. Atapour N, Falsafinejad M R, Ahmadi K, Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A. A study of the processes and contextual factors of marital infidelity. Pract Clin Psychol. 2021;9(3):211-26.  doi:10.32598/jpcp.9.3.758.2.
  7. Webster F. Theories of the information society. London: Routledge; 2014. doi: 10.4324/9781315867854.
  8. Gagnon K, Sabus C. Professionalism in a digital age: opportunities and considerations for using social media in health care. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):406-14. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130227. PubMed PMID: 24903111.
  9. Van Gasse D, Mortelmans D. Social support in the process of household reorganization after divorce. J Soc Pers Relat. 2020;37(6):1927-44. doi: 10.1177/0265407520910268.
  10. Potter MH. Social support and divorce among American couples. J Fam Issues. 2021; 42(1):88-109. doi: 10.1177/0192513X20916830.
  11. Perry SL. Does viewing pornography reduce marital quality over time? Evidence from longitudinal data. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:549-59. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0770-y.
  12. Wang Z. Anonymity effects and implications in the virtual environment: From crowd to Computer-Mediated Communication. Soc Netw. 2017;7(1):45-62. doi:10.4236/sn.2018.71004.
  13. Chung S, Lee HK. Public Health Approach to Problems Related to Excessive and Addictive Use of the Internet and Digital Media. Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10:69–76 (2023). doi: 10.1007/s40429-022-00458-z.
  14. Filimonau V, Ashton M, Stankov U. Virtual spaces as the future of consumption in tourism, hospitality and events. Journal of Tourism Futures. 202422;10(1):110-5. doi: 10.1108/JTF-07-2022-0174.
  15. Odlyzko A. Cybersecurity is not very important. Ubiquity. 2019;6:1-23. doi: 10.1145/3333611.
  16. Kellerman A. The satisfaction of human needs in physical and virtual spaces. Prof Geogr. 2014;66(4):538-46. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2013.848760.
  17. Nazoktabar H. Predicting marital infidelity based on family conditions of couples referred to social emergency. JFMH. 2020;21(3):179-184. Available from: https://jfmh.mums.ac.ir/article_16430_c2069789937fad78c3b07102821c8d60.pdf.
  18. Tuttle JD, Davis SN. Religion, infidelity, and divorce: Reexamining the effect of religious behavior on divorce among long-married couples. J Divorce Remarriage. 2015;56(6):475-89. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2015.1058660.
  19. Ariapooran S, Hajimoradi R. The Role of Spirituality Well-being, Forgiveness, and Marital Self-Disclosure in Internet Infidelity in Couples: A Survey Study. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2021;11(1):1-34. doi:10.22034/FCP.2021.61960. [In Persian]
  20. Dillard V, Moss J, Padgett N, Tan X, Kennedy AB. Attitudes, beliefs and behaviors of religiosity, spirituality, and cultural competence in the medical profession: A cross-sectional survey study. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252750. PubMed PMID: 34129642; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8205176.
  21. Omrani G, Malaekeh SH, Mirtorabi SS. The Instrumental View of the Retired by the Bureaucratic System and its Effect on their Political Culture and Spiritual Health: A Case Study of the Law Prohibiting the Employment of Retired Persons. Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat. 2020;6(3):107-21. doi: 10.22037/jrrh.v6i3.27221. [In Persian]
  22. Yousefi S, Bafghi Z R, Ahmadi  A, Joulaei  H, Bolhari  J, Mirzai  M. Spirituality Enhanced with Cognitive-Behavioral Techniques in Extramarital Infidelity: A Literature Review. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2023;26,2:e135837. doi: 10.5812/zjrms-135837.
  23. Aman J, Abbas J, Nurunnabi M, Bano S. The Relationship of Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction: The Role of Religious Commitment and Practices on Marital Satisfaction Among Pakistani Respondents. Behav Sci (Basel). 2019;9(3):30. doi: 10.3390/bs9030030. PubMed PMID: 30897729; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6466571.
  24. Maria J. The Spirituality of Marriage and Family. Herald of the East. 2018;14(1):19-34. Available from: https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/he/article/view/4090/3498.
  25. Durkheim E. The elementary forms of religious life. In: Longhofer W, Winchester D, editors. Social Theory re-wired. London: Routledge; 2016. P. 52-67.
  26. Rokach A, Chan SH. Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):3904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053904. PubMed PMID: 36900915; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10002055
  27. Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Jacobson NS. Understanding infidelity: correlates in a national random sample. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(4):735. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.735.
  28. Colón-Bacó, Enrique. The Strength of Religious Beliefs is Important for Subjective Well-Being, Undergraduate Economic Review. UER. 2010;6(1):11. Available from: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/uer/vol6/iss1/11
  29. Holt CL, Clark EM, Roth DL. Positive and Negative Religious Beliefs Explaining the Religion-Health Connection Among African Americans. Int J Psychol Relig. 2014;24(4):311-331. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2013.828993. PubMed PMID: 28546736; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5441393.
  30. Koenig Hg, Mccollough M, Larson DB. Handbook of Religion and Health. UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
  31. Neslin M . Examining the relationship between Spirituality, Morality and Resilience among Young Adults. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET). 12(5):2196-2217. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2024.62055.
  32. Aman J, Abbas J, Lela U, Shi G. Religious Affiliation, Daily Spirituals, and Private Religious Factors Promote Marital Commitment Among Married Couples: Does Religiosity Help People Amid the COVID-19 Crisis? Front Psychol. 2021;12:657400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657400. PubMed PMID: 34421712; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8377757.
  33. Kline RB. Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th-ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2023.
  34. Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;76(6):913-934. doi: 10.1177/0013164413495237. PubMed PMID: 25705052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4334479.
  35. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Cham: Springer; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
  36. Whatley M. Attitudes Toward Infidelity Scale. Georgia: Department of Psychology, Valdosta State University; 2006. Available from: https://docviewer.xdocs.net/view_v2.php.
  37. Toplu-Demirtaş E, Fincham FD. Dating infidelity in Turkish couples: The role of attitudes and Intentions. J Sex Res. 2018; 55(2):252-62. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1365110.
  38. Yousefi Moridani, M.; Falahian, H.; Mikayili, N. The role of communication beliefs, dark dimensions of personality and social trust in the attitude toward marital infidelity. Advanced Progresses in Psychology, Education Sciences and Education. 2019;26(3). Available from: https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1603294859-10146-26-1.pdf. [In Persian]
  39. Glock CY, Stark R. Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co; 1965
  40. Elyasi M, Baradaran Khanyani M, vaseai N, Ferasati A. The Mediating Role of Family Flexibility in the Relationship between Religiosity and Identity Crisis in Adolescent Girls. The Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 2023;18(64). Available from: https://cwfs.ihu.ac.ir/article_208391.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
  41. Ghorbani A. Investigating the Relationship between Religiosity and Social Capital Among Students of Golestan University. Journal of Islam and Social Sciences. 2024;10(20):121-40.doi:10.30471/soci.2019.1512. [In Persian]
  42. Serajzadeh SH. Religious Attitudes and Behaviors of Teenagers and its indications on be secular. Namayeh Pajohesh Quarterly. 1998; 7-8 Fall and Winter:105-118. Available from: https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/956720. [In Persian
  43. Hall TW, Edwards KJ. The Spiritual Assessment Inventory: A theistic model and measure for assessing spiritual development. J Sci Study Relig. 2002;41(2):341-57. doi: 10.1111/1468-5906.00121.
  44. Maeeshat, Maryam. Examining the psychometric characteristics of the Hall and Edwards spirituality test and its relationship with spiritual intelligence [dissertation]. Tehran: Central Tehran Azad Universit; Available from: https://elmnet.ir/doc/10982663-71241. [In Persian]
  45. Ghomian S, heydarinasab L. A Preliminary Study of Validity and Reliability of Spirituality Assessment Inventory (SAI). Clinical Psychology and Personality, 2014;12(1):141-158. Available from: https://cpap.shahed.ac.ir/article_2709.html?lang=en.
  46. Jahanbani N. Investigating the relationship between networks and social media on the mental health of principals of secondary schools of the first period of education in Chabahar city [Dissertation]. Bandar Jask: Islamic Azad University; 2018. [In Persian]
  47. Sharifi Sai M, Azad Aramaki T. The formation factors of marital infidelity in Iran; Metacomposite study. Review of social issues of Iran. 2019;12(2):33-74. doi: 10.22059/ijsp.2022.87903. [In Persian]
  48. Isma MN, Turnip SS. Personality traits and marital satisfaction in predicting couples’ attitudes toward infidelity. J Relat Res. 2019;10:e13. doi: doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.10.
  49. Agbo BO, Agbo CC, Gloria C. Effect of Digital Infidelity in Marital Communication among Couples in Enugu Metropolis. International Journal of Media, Security & Development (IJMSD). 2023;8(1).
  50. González-Rivera JA, Aquino-Serrano F, Pérez-Torres EM. Relationship Satisfaction and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Networks: A Preliminary Online Study of Hispanic Women. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2019;10(1):297-309. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010023. PubMed PMID: 34542486; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8314247.
  51. Morris MR, Teevan J, Panovich K. What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; 2010 April 10-15; Atlanta, Georgia, USA. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2010. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753587.
  52. Dortaj F, Rajabiyan M, Fatolahi F, Dortaj F. The relationship between the rate of using virtual social networks with loneliness and marital infidelity in students. Educational Psychology. 2018;14(47):119-40. doi: 10.22054/jep.2018.32466.2262. [In Persian]
  53. Tuttle JD, Davis SN. Religion, Infidelity, and Divorce: Reexamining the Effect of Religious Behavior on Divorce Among Long-Married Couples. J Divorce Remarriage. 2015;56(6):475-89. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2015.1058660.
  54. Husain W, Kiran A, Qasim U, Gul S, Iftikhar J. Measuring Sexual Intelligence for Evaluating Sexual Health. Psychol Rep. 2023;127(1):003329412311523. doi:10.1177/00332941231152388.
  55. Bakhtiari E, Hosseini SS, Arefi M, Afsharinia K. The Mediating Role of Marital Intimacy in the Relationship between Attachment Style and Couples' Attitude toward Infidelity. Journal of Counseling Research. 2021;20(77):122-40. doi: 10.18502/qjcr.v20i77.6144. [In Persian]

  • Receive Date 03 June 2024
  • Revise Date 13 November 2024
  • Accept Date 11 December 2024
  • Publish Date 01 June 2025