Universities’ Strategic Directions for Advancing Health and Medical Education: A Scenario-Based Qualitative Delphi Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Clinical Education Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Department of Health Care Management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

4 Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, QLD, Australia

10.30476/ijvlms.2025.107081.1336

Abstract

Background: Higher education, particularly in the field of medical sciences, has always been influenced by ongoing scientific, technological, and social changes. The emergence of new technologies, the expansion of virtual environments, and unforeseen events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have presented universities with fundamental challenges over the past two decades. In order to adapt to this rapidly evolving world, it is essential for institutions to adopt new orientations and implement innovative, entrepreneurial strategies that leverage flexible and technology-enhanced learning methods. This study aimed to develop strategic recommendations for Iranian medical and health education institutions.
Methods: A qualitative Delphi study was conducted in 2020, involving semi-structured interviews with 15 experts across three phases to identify future-oriented directions in medical education, taking into account the challenges posed by the pandemic and its profound effects on educational priorities. In the first phase, an environmental analysis was performed to determine the internal and external factors shaping the future of health education. The second phase focused on forecasting potential trajectories for health education between 2020 and 2030, with the goal of informing possible educational reforms. In the third phase, coherent strategic directions were formulated using structured scenario-building techniques. Thematic content analysis was applied to the interview data, which were analyzed at the levels of statements, components, and categories to extract key themes and insights.
Results: The study showed four possible future scenarios. The first scenario advocates for a transition toward an entrepreneurial and research-oriented academic model addressing real-world challenges. The second focuses on integrating flexible and advanced innovative learning systems. The third scenario reflects a gradual adoption of educational technologies and innovative pedagogies. The fourth envisions a regression to conventional education models, solely foundational knowledge without promoting innovation.
Conclusion: To support future-oriented, innovation-driven health education systems, universities need to continuously monitor global trends and implement strategic planning frameworks that support adaptable and sustainable educational reform.

Highlights

Rita Rezaee (Google Scholar)

Kimia Pourmohammadi (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References

  1. Wissema JG. Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009. doi:10.4337/9781848446182.
  2. Mian SA. Can entrepreneurial university model help Pakistan leapfrog into the knowledge economy? Some reflections. Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education; 2006 December 11-13; Lahore, Pakistan.
  3. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff LJRp. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. 2000;29(2):109-23.
  4. Leadbeatter D, Nanayakkara S, Zhou X, Gao J. Employability in health professional education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03913-7. PubMed PMID: 36650469; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9844949.
  5. Almazova N, Krylova E, Rubtsova A, Odinokaya M. Challenges and opportunities for Russian higher education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ perspective. Educ Sci. 2020;10(12):368. doi:10.3390/educsci10120368.
  6. Crawford J, Butler-Henderson K, Rudolph J, Malkawi B, Glowatz M, Burton R, et al. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J Appl Learn Teach. 2020;3(1):1-20. doi: 10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
  7. Guerrero M, Urbano D. The development of an entrepreneurial university. J Technol Transf. 2012;37(1):43-74. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x.
  8. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(2):205-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x. PubMed PMID: 16422719.
  9. Tee PK, Wong LC, Dada M, Song BL, Ng CP. Demand for Digital Skills, Skill Gaps and Graduate Employability: Evidence from Employers in Malaysia. F1000Research. 2024;13:389. doi:10.12688/f1000research.148514.1.
  10. Karimian Z, Salehi N, Moro C. Intersecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Artificial Intelligence in Medical and Health Sciences Education: A Perspective. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2025;16(1):1-7. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.106124.1331.
  11. Dehnavieh R. Beneficial and adverse effects of the integration of medical education and health service in IR. Iran; a Delphi exercise. J Med Sci. 2014;14(1):21-8. doi:10.3923/jms.2014.21.28.
  12. Hopman J, Allegranzi B, Mehtar S. Managing COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1549-1550. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4169. PubMed PMID: 32176764.
  13. Ghorbani AA, Sohrabi Z, Yazdani S, Khalili Azandehi S. Towards the third generation universities: The core innovative function approach. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021;35:32. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.32. PubMed PMID: 34211934; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8236088.
  14. Mahmoud B, Peivand B. The Challenges Of Stewardship In Medical Education System: A Qualitative Approach. Payavard Salamat. 2013;7(4):299-311. Available from: http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5120-en.html. [In Persian]
  15. Pourabbasi A, Haghdoost A, Akbari H, Kheiry Z, Dehnavieh R, Noorihekmat S, Rahimi SH, Larijani B. Packages for reform and innovation in medical education in Islamic Republic of Iran; a conceptual framework. 2017;26(1):45-50. [In Persian]
  16. Kavosi Z, Rahimi H, Qanbari P, HAIDARI L, Bahmaei J. Investigation of quality gap of educational services from the viewpoints of students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2013. Sadra Medical Journal. 2014;2(2):161-72. Available from: https://smsj.sums.ac.ir/article_44023.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
  17. Maximova O, Belyaev V, Laukart-Gorbacheva O, Nagmatullina L, Hamzina G. Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities' Discourse: Employers' Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016;11(16):9101-12. Available from: http://www.ijese.net/makale/1150.html.
  18. Guo X. Evolving landscapes in global medical education: navigating challenges and embracing innovation. Global Medical Education. 2024;1(1):1–2. Available from: https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gme-2024-0003/html.
  19. Chatzistamou I. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change? J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024;11:23821205241300944. doi: 10.1177/23821205241300944. PubMed PMID: 39583779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11583277.
  20. Salehi A, Harris N, Lotfi F, Hashemi N, Kojouri J, Amini M. Reform in medical and health sciences educational system: a Delphi study of faculty members' views at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;20(3):151-61. PubMed PMID: 24950072.
  21. Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L. University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and corporate change. 2007;16(4):691-791. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm023.
  22. Gordon TJ, Helmer O. Report on a long-range forecasting study. California: The RAND Corporation; 1966.
  23. Lincoln YS. Naturalistic inquiry. USA: SAGE; 1985.
  24. Walsh JP, Huang H. Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists. Research Policy. 2014;43(2):245-60. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.003.
  25. Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research. Journal of Administration & Governance. 2009;4(2):72–9.
  26. Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131-2132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227. PubMed PMID: 32232420.
  27. Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;35:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.009. PubMed PMID: 32653468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7301824.
  28. Oducado RMF, Soriano GP. Shifting the education paradigm amid the COVID 19 pandemic: Nursing students’ attitude to E learning. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2021;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.25159/2520-5293/8090.
  29. Ali L. The shift to online education paradigm due to COVID-19: A study of student’s behavior in UAE universities environment. IJIET. 2021;11(3):131-6. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.3.1501.
  30. Levan M, Luiza G, Leila A, Levan B, Lia G. Distance Learning in Medical Education: COVID-19 Pandemic-Contingency Plan or a Paradigm Shift. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT). 2021;27(1):76-82. doi: 10.52155/ijpsat.v27.1.3148.
  31. Potts III JR. Residency and fellowship program accreditation: effects of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(6):1094-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.026. PubMed PMID: 32251848; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7194857.
  32. Moro C, Spooner A, McLean M. How prepared are students for the various transitions in their medical studies? An Australian university pilot study. MedEdPublish (2016). 2019;8:25. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000025.1. PubMed PMID: 38089370; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10712595.
  33. Martínez-Martínez SL, Ventura R. Entrepreneurial Profiles at the University: A Competence Approach. Front Psychol. 2020;11:612796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612796. PubMed PMID: 33391131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7775538.
  34. Etzkowitz H. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of technology and globalisation. 2004;1(1):64-77. doi:10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551.
  35. Nunes IL. Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions; 2016 July 27-3; Disney World®, Florida, USA. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41956-5.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 May 2025
  • Revise Date: 09 June 2025
  • Accept Date: 21 June 2025
  • Publish Date: 01 June 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics