Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences

Effectiveness of Gamified Scratch-Based Learning Environment on Self-Efficacy, Perceived Usefulness, and Response Efficacy Among Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sima Alizadeh 1
Tayebeh Haghanikhah 2
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Educational Technology, Payame Noor University, Kish, Iran
10.30476/ijvlms.2026.106578.1334
Abstract
Background: With the rise of new technologies, education has increasingly integrated technology into teaching and learning processes, which enhances the appeal and effectiveness of educational content while fostering students’ skills for future challenges. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a gamified smart course on students’ self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, and response efficacy regarding technology integration in teaching.
Methods: This research used a quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test measures, including a control group. The participants were all seventh-grade female students from schools in Ahvaz, Iran, during September 2023 to May 2024. A total of 40 students were selected and divided into two groups of 20. They were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (which used a gamified smart learning approach) or the control group (which followed traditional teaching methods). Data were gathered using standard questionnaires assessing online learning self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, and response efficacy. The experimental group received instruction through game-based e-learning software, while the control group was taught using conventional methods. Data analysis was conducted using univariate Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with SPSS version 26.
Results: At baseline, independent t-tests revealed no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in self-efficacy (experimental: 73.20±2.33; control: 71.40±1.82, p= 0.56), perceived usefulness (experimental: 12.35±0.40; control: 11.85±0.37, p= 0.12), and response efficacy (experimental: 9.90±0.55; control: 9.35±0.58, p= 0.14). Following the intervention, ANCOVA analyses controlling for pre-test scores demonstrated significant group differences across all three outcomes. The experimental group showed higher post-test self-efficacy (89.55±2.99) compared to the control group (69.30±1.58), p < 0.001. Perceived usefulness was greater in the experimental group (13.35±0.32) than in the control group (11.35±1.47), p= 0.001. Response efficacy was significantly higher in the experimental group (13.20±0.89) compared to the control group (9.45±0.40), p< 0.001. These findings confirm the positive impact of the intervention on all three outcomes.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the potential of gamified smart courses as a valuable educational tool. Future studies could investigate their long-term effects and applicability in diverse educational settings.

Highlights

Sima Alizadeh (Google Scholar)

Keywords
Educational Technology
Self Efficacy
Perception
Teaching, Students
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Video Games
  1. Šabić J, Baranović B, Rogošić S. Teachers’ self-efficacy for using information and communication technology: The interaction effect of gender and age. Informatics Educ. 2022;21(2):353-73. doi: 10.15388/infedu.2022.11.
  2. Ahmed HD, Asiksoy G. The effects of gamified flipped learning method on student’s innovation skills, self-efficacy towards virtual physics lab course and perceptions. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10163. doi: 10.3390/su131810163.
  3. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.
  4. Hellín CJ, Calles-Esteban F, Valledor A, Gómez J, Otón-Tortosa S, Tayebi A. Enhancing student motivation and engagement through a gamified learning environment. Sustainability. 2023;15(19):14119. doi:3390/su151914119.
  5. Ortiz Rojas ME, Chiluiza K, Valcke M. Gamification in computer programming: Effects on learning, engagement, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning (ECGBL 2017). 2017 Oct 05; Graz, Austria. England: Acad Conferences LTD; 2017.
  6. Zhang Y. The Effect of on Educational Technology on EFL Learners' Self-Efficacy. Front Psychol. 2022;13:881301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881301. PubMed PMID: 35496186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9043317.
  7. Ozerbas MA, Erdogan BH. The effect of the digital classroom on academic success and online technologies self-efficacy. J Educ Technol Soc. 2016;1;19(4):203-12.
  8. Meluso A, Zheng M, Spires HA, Lester J. Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Comput Educ. 2012;59(2):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019.
  9. Yao N, Wang Q. Factors influencing pre-service special education teachers’ intention toward AI in education: Digital literacy, teacher self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Heliyon. 2024;30;10(14):e34894. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34894.
  10. Tennakoon H, Hansen JM, Saridakis G, Samaratunga M, Hansen JW. Drivers and barriers of social sustainable development and growth of online higher education: The roles of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Sustainability. 2023;19;15(10):8319. doi: 10.3390/su15108319.
  11. Ng LK, Lo CK. Flipped classroom and gamification approach: Its impact on performance and academic commitment on sustainable learning in education. Sustainability. 2022;30;14(9):5428. doi: 10.3390/su14095428.
  12. Siregar HS. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of online learning for Islamic religious education teacher. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. 2023;9(1):93-106. doi: 10.15575/jpi.v0i0.25518.
  13. Alam SS, Ahsan N, Kokash HA, Alam S, Ahmed S. A students’ behaviors in information security: Extension of Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). Inf Secur J Glob Perspect. 2025;34(3):191-213. doi: 10.1080/19393555.2024.2408264.
  14. Tzur S, Katz A, Davidovich N. Learning Supported by Technology: Effectiveness with Educational Software. EU-JER. 2021;10(3), 1137-56. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1139.
  15. Alsawaier RS. The Effect of Gamification on Motivation and Engagement. IJILT. 2018;35(1):56-79. doi: 10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009.
  16. Kim S, Chon MG. Embodying Temporality in Response Efficacy: How Coping Appraisal Promotes Preventive Behavioral Engagement During the Ongoing Pandemic. Health Commun. 2023;38(11):2359-2369. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2069316. PubMed PMID: 35505450.
  17. Vanduhe VZ, Nat M, Hasan HF. Continuance Intentions to Use Gamification for Training in Higher Education: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Motivation, and Task Technology Fit (TTF). IEEE Access. 2020;13;8:21473-84. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966179.
  18. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989;1:319-39. doi:10.2307/249008.
  19. Felszeghy S, Pasonen-Seppänen S, Koskela A, Nieminen P, Härkönen K, Paldanius KMA, Gabbouj S, Ketola K, Hiltunen M, Lundin M, Haapaniemi T, Sointu E, Bauman EB, Gilbert GE, Morton D, Mahonen A. Using online game-based platforms to improve student performance and engagement in histology teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1701-0. PubMed PMID: 31331319; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6647160.
  20. Hosseini Z. The effect of using electronic educational games on the motivation and performance of fifth grade male students in Famen city in the academic year 2019-2020. [Dissertation]. Payam Noor University of Hamadan Province: Payam Noor Center of Hamadan; 2019 [In Persian]
  21. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F, Moattari M. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-45. PubMed PMID: 24597923; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3975717.
  22. Yavuzalp N, Bahcivan E. The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into Turkish and interpretation according to various variables. TOJDE. 2020;21(1):31-44. doi:10.17718/tojde.674388.
  23. Haghanikhah T. The effectiveness of a gamified smart course on students' self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, and response efficacy regarding the integration of technology in teaching [Master’s Thesis]. Kish: Payame Noor University of Hormozgan: International Kish Center; 2025.
  24. Ateş H, Kölemen CŞ. Integrating theories for insight: An amalgamated Model for Gamified Virtual Reality Adoption by Science Teachers. Educ Inf Technol. 2025;30(2):2123-53. doi: 1007/s10639-024-12892-9.
  25. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). In: Lovric M. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Berlin: Springer; 2025. P. 1616-19. doi:1007/978-3-662-69359-9_398.
  26. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. PubMed PMID: 22036893.
  27. Ateş H, Gündüzalp C. The convergence of GETAMEL and protection motivation theory: A study on augmented reality-based gamification adoption among science teachers. Educ Inf Technol. 2025;30:17361-403. doi: 1007/s10639-025-13480-1.
  28. Artino AR Jr. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(2):76-85. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5. PubMed PMID: 23316462; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3540350.
  29. Hung CM, Huang I, Hwang GJ. Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. J Comput Educ. 2014;1:151–66. doi: 10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8.
  30. Aljamaan A, Alsaber A, Emmanuel C, Alkandari A. Leveling up learning effectiveness in STEM education through gamification: an empirical study on behavioral intention and digital literacy among undergraduate students in Kuwait. Front Educ. 2025;26(10): 1586466. doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1586466.
  31. Rachels JR, Rockinson-Szapkiw AJ. The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2018;1(1-2):72-89. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536.
  32. Dubovi I. Learning with virtual reality simulations: Direct versus vicarious instructional experience. Interactive Learning Environments. 2023;31(10):6627-39. doi: 1080/10494820.2022.2042313.
  33. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2014 January 6-9; Hawaii, USA. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 2014. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 .
  34. Chen G, Jin Y, Liang W, Liu Y. Study on the influence of middle school students’ self-efficacy on the willingness to use online learning platform. Int J Elec Eng Educ. 2023;60(2-suppl):339-61. doi: 10.1177/0020720920984030.
  35. Eltahir ME, Alsalhi NR, Al-Qatawneh S, AlQudah HA, Jaradat M. The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26:3251-78. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10396-w.
  36. Bagheri M, Taliei R. The effects of Gamification on Learning and Retention of Environmental Concepts of Students. Journals of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2021;9(3):23-32. doi: 10.30473/ee.2021.55399.2273. [In Persian]
  37. Barata G, Gama S, Jorge JA, Gonçalves DJ. Relating gaming habits with student performance in a gamified learning experience. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play. 2014 Oct 19-21; Ontario, Canada. NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2014. doi:10.1145/2658537.2658692 .
  38. Morales-Trujillo ME, García-Mireles GA. Gamification and SQL: An Empirical Study on Student Performance in a Database Course. TOCE. 2020;21(1):1-29. doi:10.1145/3427597.
  39. Pan X. Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Front Psychol. 2020;11:564294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294.
  40. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MISQ. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
  41. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum; 1985.

  • Receive Date 16 April 2025
  • Revise Date 11 January 2026
  • Accept Date 17 February 2026
  • Publish Date 01 March 2026